Beta 2024 RR 250 2T vs Brixton Felsberg 250

Compare Specifications of Beta 2024 RR 250 2T and Brixton Felsberg 250

Selected Bikes

Beta 2024 RR 250 2T
Beta 2024 RR 250 2T

Brand:

Model:

Brixton Felsberg 250
Brixton Felsberg 250

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 2 stroke liquid cooled Single cylinder four stroke engine, 4 valves, air-cooled
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Engine Lubrication Mixing with electrical pump --
Clutch Wet multi-disc with reverse opening --
Fuel System Keihin PWK 36 Carburettor --
Ignition AC Kokusan - Digital CDI ECU
Cooling System Liquid cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power -- 16.8 PS @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 16.5 NM @ 6500 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity -- 325 kg
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission 6 gears 5-speed manual
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain Chain --
Top Speed -- 114 kmph
Frame Molybdenum steel with double cradle split above the exhaust post --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 100/90-18
Rear -- 120/80-17
Wheel / RIM -- Front Rim: 2.50 x 18
Rear Rim: 3.00 x 17
Brakes
Front -- Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 276 mm
Rear -- Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 220 mm
Suspension
Front -- Teleskopic fork upside-down
Rear -- Swingarm with 2 shock absorbers
Colors Available
Colors -- Backstage Black
Timberwolf Grey
Backstage Black (2022)
Cargo Green (2022)


Physical Specs
Length 2172 mm 2050 mm
Width 815 mm 850 mm
Height 1270 mm 1120 mm
Weight -- 155 kg
Wheelbase 1482 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 14.5 litres
Overview
About The Beta 2024 RR 250 2T is fitted with a 249.00 cc single-cylinder 2-stroke liquid-cooled engin Read More --
Features -- - KOSO LED indicators
- LED beams front and rear plus
- ABS Brakes And Adjustable Rear Shock Absorbers As Standard
Additional Details Exhaust Valve: BPV system
Spark Plug: NGK BR8ES
Induction System: Induction reed
Engine Oil: SAE 10W/40
Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :3.2 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 73 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1953