Big Boy Voge 300AC vs Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Compare Specifications of Big Boy Voge 300AC and Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Selected Bikes

Big Boy Voge 300AC
Big Boy Voge 300AC

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban
Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 292.40 cc 296.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, Liquid-Cooled Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System -- Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 29 PS @ 8500 rpm 40 PS @ 11500 RPM
Maximum Torque 25 Nm @ 7000 rpm 25.7 NM @ 10000 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 150kg --
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 130 kmph --
Battery 12V 7AH --
Display Digital Display --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 29.4 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/70-17 Tubeless 100/90-19M/C 57S
Rear 150/60-17 Tubeless 130/80-17M/C 65S
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear Disc Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston
Suspension
Front -- 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear -- Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock and adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors -- Metallic Spark Black
Candy Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length 2025 mm 2170 mm
Width 790 mm 860 mm
Height 1090 mm 1390 mm
Weight 150 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 175
Seat Height 795 --
Wheelbase 1360 mm 1450 mm
Ground Clearance 165 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Topcase System 30 Litres
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 3.087 (71/23)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.714 (38/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.789 (34/19)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.160 (29/25)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.000 (27/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.857 (24/28)
Final reduction ratio : 3.286 (46/14)
Fuel consumption : 4.1 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 103 g/km
Trail : 108 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 148 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4998