Brixton Cromwell 1200 X vs Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES

Compare Specifications of Brixton Cromwell 1200 X and Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES

Selected Bikes

Brixton Cromwell 1200 X
Brixton Cromwell 1200 X

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES
Yamaha 2022 Super Tenere ES

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1222.00 cc 1199.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, two-cylinder, four-stroke in-line engine with four valves per cylinder Liquid-cooled inline 2-cylinder; DOHC; 8 valves
Engine Starting E-starter --
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection with YCC-T
Ignition ECU TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Maximum Power 83 Ps @ 6550 rpm --
Maximum Torque 108 Nm @ 3100 rpm --
Load Carrying Capacity 455 Kg --
Transmission 6-speed manual 6-speed; multi-plate wet clutch
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Shaft
Top Speed 198 kmph --
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 21 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 110/80-18 110/80R19
Rear 150/70-17 150/70R17
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: Spoked rim 2.50 X 18
Rear Rim: Spoked rim 4.25 X 17
--
Brakes
Front Two brake discs, perforated, Ø 310 mm Dual 310mm hydraulic disc, Unified Brake System and ABS
Rear One brake disc, perforated, Ø 260 mm 282mm single disc, Unified Brake System and ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic suspension fork (KYB) 43mm inverted fork; electronically adjustable compression and rebound damping; 7.5-in travel
Rear Double strut (KYB) Monoshock; electronically adjustable preload and rebound damping; 7.5-in of travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Matte Raven Black


Physical Specs
Length 2180 mm 2255 mm
Width 860 mm 980 mm
Height 1115 mm 1409 mm
Weight 235 kg --
Seat Height 800 845-871
Wheelbase -- 1539 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 23 litres
Overview
About The Brixton Cromwell 1200 X stands out with its 1222 cc engine, generating a solid 83 Ps of pow Read More --
Features -- Luggage Ready
Beefy Controls
Standard Centerstand
Electronic Suspension
Cruise Control
Traction Control
D-Mode Throttle
All-Purpose Drivetrain
Advanced Fuel Injection
Additional Details -- Fuel Economy: 43 mpg
Wet Weight: 584 lb
Rake (Caster Angle): 28.0°

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2457