Brixton Cromwell 125 vs TVS Raider 125

Compare Specifications of Brixton Cromwell 125 and TVS Raider 125

Selected Bikes

Brixton Cromwell 125
Brixton Cromwell 125

Brand:

Model:

TVS Raider 125
TVS Raider 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.80 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, air-cooled Air & Oil cooled single cylinder, SI
Engine Starting Electric --
Ignition ECU --
Cooling System Air-cooled --
Maximum Power 10.9 PS @ 9000 RPM 11.38 PS @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 9.7 NM @ 6500 RPM 11.2 Nm @ 6000 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 304 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual 5 Speed
Top Speed 99 kmph --
Battery -- MF Battery, 12V 4Ah
Display Digital speedometer features fuel, high beam and turn signal indicators, tachometer, odometer, neutral gear lamp. --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 80/100 - 17 Tubeless, 46P
Rear 120/80-17 100/90 - 17 Tubeless, 55P
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2.50x18
Rear Rim: 3.00x17
--
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake, brake disc: 276 mm Disc - 240
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with CBS, brake disc: 220 mm Drum - 130 SBT
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork Telescopic
Rear Swingarm with dual schock absorbers Monoshock, 5-step adj, Gas charged
Colors Available
Colors Charly Brown
Timberwolf Grey
Moss Green
Backstage Black
Submarine Yellow
Striking Red


Physical Specs
Length 2020 mm 2070 mm
Width 850 mm 785 mm
Height 1105 mm 1028 mm
Weight 134 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 123
Seat Height 770 --
Wheelbase -- 1326 mm
Ground Clearance -- 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 10 litres
Overview
About -- The TVS Raider 125 features a 124.80 cc engine, delivering 11.38 PS of power and 11.2 Nm of tor Read More
Features Available with combined braking system (in all colours), or anti-lock braking system (Moss Green, Sterling Grey and Royal Blue). Tvs Raider 125 Features
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :2,3 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 53 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7819