Brixton Cromwell 250 vs Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230SM ABS

Compare Specifications of Brixton Cromwell 250 and Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230SM ABS

Selected Bikes

Brixton Cromwell 250
Brixton Cromwell 250

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230SM ABS
Kawasaki 2024 KLX 230SM ABS

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 233.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, 4 valves, air-cooled 4-stroke single, SOHC, air-cooled
Engine Starting Electric --
Fuel System -- DFI with dual 32mm throttle bodies
Ignition ECU TCBI with Electronic Advance
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 16.8 PS @ 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 16.5 NM @ 6500 RPM 17.8 Nm @ 6,400 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity 315 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain -- Sealed chain
Top Speed 114 kmph --
Display Digital LCD Instrumentation with Smartphone Connectivity via Rideology The App Motorcycle
Frame -- Perimeter, high-tensile steel
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 110/70-17
Rear 120/80-17 120/70-17
Wheel / RIM Front Rim : 2.50 x 18
Rear Rim : 3.00 x 17
17-Inch Wheels
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 276 mm Single 300mm petal disc with a dual-piston caliper and ABS
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 220 mm Single 220mm petal disc with single-piston caliper and ABS
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork 37mm inverted fork/7.4 in
Rear Swingarm with 2 shock absorbers Uni-Trak linkage system and single shock with adjustable spring preload/8.7 in
Colors Available
Colors Titanium Black / Sterling Grey
Desert Gold / Clockwork Orange
Battle Gray


Physical Specs
Length 2020 mm 2034.54 mm
Width 850 mm 843.28 mm
Height 1105 mm 1122.68 mm
Weight 145 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 136
Seat Height 790 838.2
Wheelbase -- 1363.98 mm
Ground Clearance -- 218.44 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 7.5 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :3.1 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 71 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7596