Brixton Felsberg 125 XC vs Sherco 125 SE-R

Compare Specifications of Brixton Felsberg 125 XC and Sherco 125 SE-R

Selected Bikes

Brixton Felsberg 125 XC
Brixton Felsberg 125 XC

Brand:

Model:

Sherco 125 SE-R
Sherco 125 SE-R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.81 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, air-cooled 2 Stroke “Single cylinder with electronically controlled exhaust valve
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch -- Hydraulic, multidisc in oil bath
Fuel System -- Keihin PWK 36
Ignition ECU DC - CDI ignition with digital advance
Cooling System Air-cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 10.9 PS @ 9000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 9.7 NM @ 6500 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity 304 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual 6 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 99 kmph --
Battery -- 12 V / 4Ah Yuasa
Frame -- High strenght Chrome-Molybdenum steel semi-perimeter
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 1.60 x 21" Black rim with Michelin Enduro Competition
Rear 120/80-17 2.15 x 18" Back anodized Excel rim with Michelin Enduro Competition
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2.50x18
Rear Rim: 3.00x17
Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake, brake disc: 276 mm 260 mm Brembo Hydraulique
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with CBS, brake disc: 220 mm 220 mm Brembo Hydraulique
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork WP XPLOR fork, setting on the top (compression, rebound)
Rear Swingarm with dual schock absorbers WP Monoshock progressive rear suspension with aluminum control rods, adjustable for high and low speed compression and spring pre-load.
Colors Available
Colors Quick Silver --


Physical Specs
Length 2070 mm --
Width 850 mm --
Height 1120 mm --
Weight 134 kg --
Seat Height 820 --
Wheelbase -- 1465 mm
Ground Clearance -- 355 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 10.4 litres
Overview
Features Front mudguard
Underbody protection
--
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption : 2,5 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 57 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7435