Brixton Felsberg 125 vs Fantic XEF 125 Performance

Compare Specifications of Brixton Felsberg 125 and Fantic XEF 125 Performance

Selected Bikes

Brixton Felsberg 125
Brixton Felsberg 125

Brand:

Model:

Fantic XEF 125 Performance
Fantic XEF 125 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.60 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, air-cooled Single cylinder 4 strokes Euro5, SOHC 4-valve, Variable camshaft timing
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch -- Wet multidisc, back-torque limiter
Ignition ECU Electronic
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 10.9 PS @ 9000 RPM 15 PS @ 9.750 RPM
Maximum Torque 9.7 NM @ 6500 RPM 11.8 NM @ 6750 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 304 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual --
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 99 kmph --
Frame -- Perimeter frame steel CrMo
Handle Bar -- 22 steel
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 90/90x21
Rear 120/80-17 120/90x18
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2.50x18
Rear Rim: 3.00x17
Aluminium, black anodized
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake, brake disc: 276 mm Disc “Wave” ø260mm - combined brake system
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with CBS, brake disc: 220 mm Disc “Wave” ø220mm, combined brake system
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork FANTIC ø41mm USD
Rear Swingarm with dual schock absorbers FANTIC 125 – preload regulation
Colors Available
Colors Cargo Green
Timberwolf Grey
Backstage Black
Charly Brown
--


Physical Specs
Length 2020 mm 2110 mm
Width 850 mm --
Height 1105 mm --
Weight 134 kg 112 kg
Seat Height 800 915
Wheelbase -- 1420 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 7.5 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption : 2,5 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 57 g/km
Fuel consumption: 1,8 l/100 km
Swingarm: Steel, progressive link
Triple clamps: Forged aluminum
Exhaust:Manifold and muffler Euro5 by ARROW
CO2 Emission: 43 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6316