Canyon Endurace CF 7 vs Liv Devote Advanced Pro

Compare Specifications of Canyon Endurace CF 7 and Liv Devote Advanced Pro

Selected Bikes

Canyon Endurace CF 7
Canyon Endurace CF 7

Brand:

Model:

Liv Devote Advanced Pro
Liv Devote Advanced Pro

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Canyon Endurace CF Disc, comfortable carbon road frame, 12x142 mm Advanced-Grade Composite
Stem -- Giant Contact, 8-degree
Handle Bar Canyon Ergospeed Gel Giant Contact SLR XR D-Fuse, 31.8, 5° back sweep, flare drop
Fork Canyon FK0110 CF Disc, Superlight carbon fork Advanced-Grade Composite, full-composite OverDrive steerer, 12 x 142mm thru-axle, disc
Seatpost Carbon Canyon SP0057 VCLS Giant D-Fuse SLR, composite
Crankset Shimano 105 R7100 SRAM Force D1 DUB, 30/43
Chain Shimano CN-M6100 SRAM Force D1, 12-speed
Shifters -- SRAM Force eTap AXS
Saddle Selle Italia Model X Liv Alacra SL
Derailleur Front Shimano 105 R7100 SRAM Force eTap AXS
Derailleur Rear Shimano 105 R7100 12s SRAM Force eTap AXS
Hub Front -- Giant CXR-2 Carbon Disc WheelSystem
Hub Rear -- Giant CXR-2 Carbon Disc WheelSystem
Spoke -- Giant CXR-2 Carbon Disc WheelSystem
Cassette Shimano CS-R7107 11-36 12s SRAM Force, 12-speed, 10 x 36
Bottom Bracket Token Ninja Lite BB4124 SRAM DUB, press fit
Tyres
Front Schwalbe One, 30mm Maxxis Velocita, 700 x 40c, tubeless
Rear Schwalbe One, 32mm Maxxis Velocita, 700 x 40c, tubeless
Wheel / RIM F: DT Swiss Endurance LN, 12x100 mm, 22 mm, Aluminium
R: DT Swiss Endurance LN SH11, 12x142 mm, 22 mm, Aluminium
Giant CXR-2 Carbon Disc WheelSystem
Brakes
Front 160 mm Shimano RT70 Disc SRAM Force eTap AXS hydraulic
Rear 160 mm Shimano RT70 Disc SRAM Force eTap AXS hydraulic
Brake Lever Shimano 105 R7120 2s SRAM Force eTap AXS hydraulic
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Slate
Coconut
Stealth
Chameleon Blue
Reflective Mushroom


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 8.94 kg --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Sizes : XS, S, M, L
Tubeless prepared

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7874