Canyon Grail CFR Di2 vs Peugeot eM02 Bosch Active Line 29

Compare Specifications of Canyon Grail CFR Di2 and Peugeot eM02 Bosch Active Line 29

Selected Bikes

Canyon Grail CFR Di2
Canyon Grail CFR Di2

Brand:

Model:

Peugeot eM02 Bosch Active Line 29
Peugeot eM02 Bosch Active Line 29

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor -- BOSCH ACTIVE LINE
Range -- UP TO 110 KM
Battery Shimano BT-DN110 Di2 Battery BOSCH POWERTUBE, 400 WH
Charger -- COMPACT 2AH (100-240V)
Display -- BOSCH PURION
Frame Canyon Grail CFR ALUMINIUM 6061 T6, DISQUE, HYDROFORME
Stem -- ALUMINIUM 70 X 31.8 X 7°
Handle Bar Canyon Ergospeed Gel ALUMINIUM RISE 20 MM 720 X 20 X 31.8 X 6°
Fork Canyon FK0118 CF Disc SUNTOUR XCR34-BOOST HYDRAULIQUE AVEC LOCKOUT
Seatpost Canyon SP0072 TEC OBVIUS 31.6 X 350 MM, 15 MM OFFSET
Crankset Shimano RX810 ALUMINIUM 170, 38 TEETH
Chain Shimano CN-HG701 11s --
Shifters -- SHIMANO ALIVIO, SL-M4000, 9V
Saddle Terra Argo X1 SELLE ROYAL VIVO
Derailleur Front Shimano GRX Di2 RX815 --
Derailleur Rear Shimano RD-RX815 SHIMANO ALIVIO, RD-M4000-SGS
Hub Front -- SHIMANO MT400-B / M4050 CENTERLOCK 32T
Hub Rear -- SHIMANO MT400-B / M4050 CENTERLOCK 32T
Cassette Shimano Ultegra HG800 11-34 11s SHIMANO CS-HG400-9, 11-36T
Bottom Bracket Token Ninja Lite BB4124 --
Tyres
Front Schwalbe G-One RS Evo HUTCHINSON SQUALE 29 X 2.25'' 48-52 / 27.5 X 2.25'' 40-44
Rear Schwalbe G-One RS Evo HUTCHINSON SQUALE 29 X 2.25'' 48-52 / 27.5 X 2.25'' 40-44
Wheel / RIM DT Swiss GRC1100 SPOKE
Brakes
Front -- 180 MM SHIMANO MT201 HYDRAULIQUES
Rear -- 160 MM SHIMANO MT201 HYDRAULIQUES
Brake Lever Shimano GRX Di2 RX815 --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Hale-Bopp
Mars Attack
GREEN


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 8.30 kg 22.1 kg
Overview
About -- eM02 Bosch Active Line 27.5 is Bosch Active Line Model with 27.5 inch Hutchinson Squale tires. Read More
Features -- - DUAL DISC BRAKES
- ALUMINIUM FRAME
Additional Details -- SIZE : 48 (L) - 52 (XL)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8783