Capirelli Explorer 300T/E5 vs Yamaha Tricity 300

Compare Specifications of Capirelli Explorer 300T/E5 and Yamaha Tricity 300

Selected Bikes

Capirelli Explorer 300T/E5
Capirelli Explorer 300T/E5

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 300
Yamaha Tricity 300

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 276.00 cc 292.00 cc
Engine Engine type 4-stroke single cylinder 4V, 300 cc single-cylinder liquid-cooled Delphi direct injection engine Single cylinder, liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System Fuel injection Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooling liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 26 HP @ 8000 RPM 27.6 PS @ 7250 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 29.0 NM @ 5750 RPM
Transmission -- V-Belt Automatic
Top Speed 125 kmph --
Display Digital --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/70–15 120/70-14M/C 55P Tubeless
Rear 140/60-14 140/70-14M/C 62P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM 15 or 14 inch wheels Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc with ABS Hydraulic disc brake, Ø267 mm
Rear Disc with ABS Hydraulic single disc brake, Ø267 mm
Suspension
Front -- Double telescopic fork
Rear -- Unit Swing
Colors Available
Colors Blue
Brown
Nimbus Grey
Tech Kamo
Gunmetal Grey


Physical Specs
Length 2227 mm 2250 mm
Width 786 mm 815 mm
Height 1291 mm 1470 mm
Weight -- 239 kg
Seat Height 770 795
Wheelbase -- 1595 mm
Ground Clearance -- 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 13 litres
Overview
Features - Braking system is equipped with dual assistant and ABS
- LED front and rear lights

Capirelli Explorer 300t E5
LED Headlight

Capirelli Explorer 300t E5
Digital Display

Capirelli Explorer 300t E5
Taillamp
- 3-wheel Urban Mobility with Tricity DNA
- Economical and powerful 300cc BLUE CORE engine
- Standing Assist System
- Lightest in class / Autonomy
- Large storage space
- LCD instruments and high-quality finish
- Large diameter disc brakes
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 3.3 l / 100 km
CO2 emission : 77g / km
Front travel : 100 mm
Rear travel : 84 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5743