CCM Foggy Edition Spitfire vs Kawasaki 2024 Ninja 650

Compare Specifications of CCM Foggy Edition Spitfire and Kawasaki 2024 Ninja 650

Selected Bikes

CCM Foggy Edition Spitfire
CCM Foggy Edition Spitfire

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki 2024 Ninja 650
Kawasaki 2024 Ninja 650

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 600.00 cc 649.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, Four-stroke 4-stroke, Parallel Twin, DOHC, 8-valve, liquid cooled
Clutch Multiple-disc, wet, Hydraulic control --
Fuel System Injection: Mikuni D45 DFI with dual 36mm Keihin throttle bodies
Ignition -- TCBI with Electronic Advance
Cooling System Liquid --
Maximum Power 62 BHP --
Maximum Torque 66 NM @ 5500 RPM --
Transmission 6 Speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Drivetrain -- Sealed chain
Frame High strength steel, TIG welded Trellis, high-tensile steel
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 23.80 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 19" x120mm Flat Track tyres 120/70 x 17
Rear 19" x120mm Flat Track tyres 160/60 x 17
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front 320 mm Twin Disc Dual 300mm petal-type discs and 2-piston calipers (and ABS)
Rear 240 mm Disc Single 220mm petal-type disc and single-piston caliper (and ABS)
Suspension
Front 130 mm wheel travel. Adjustable 41mm hydraulic telescopic fork/4.9 in
Rear 130 mm wheel travel. Adjustable Horizontal back-link with adjustable spring preload/5.1 in
Colors Available
Colors -- Metallic Matte Dark Gray/Metallic Spark Black/Metallic Flat Spark Black
Metallic Matte Covert Green/Metallic Spark Black/Pearl Sand Khaki
Metallic Matte Graphene Steel Gray/Ebony


Physical Specs
Length 2145 mm 2054 mm
Width -- 739 mm
Height 1165 mm 1145 mm
Weight 142 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 192
Seat Height 825 789
Wheelbase 1455 mm 1409 mm
Ground Clearance -- 29 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 15 litres
Overview
About -- The 2024 Kawasaki Ninja 650 presents an engaging riding experience, particularly due to its 649 Read More
Features -- - Kawasaki TRaction Control (KTRC), ABS

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8688