Cinelli Zydeco Lala vs CUBE Litening C:68X SLT

Compare Specifications of Cinelli Zydeco Lala and CUBE Litening C:68X SLT

Selected Bikes

Cinelli Zydeco Lala
Cinelli Zydeco Lala

Brand:

Model:

CUBE Litening C:68X SLT
CUBE Litening C:68X SLT

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame COLUMBUS Zonal Triple Butted Alloy Litening C: 68X Monocoque Advanced Twin Mold Technology
Stem CINELLI 6061 Stem --
Handle Bar CINELLI Handlebar FLARE 6061 / Ø 31,8 / Drop 120 mm Litening C: 68X ICR Aero Cockpit System
Fork COLUMBUS Disc Alu / Carbon 1 "-1/8 Litening C: 68X Aero, Integrated Cable Routing, Flat Mount Disc
Seats Seat Clamp : 31,8 mm Seat Clamp : CUBE Full Integrated Aero Clamp
Seatpost CINELLI Seatpost 6061 / Ø27.2 / L350 Litening C: 68X Aero, Comfort Flex
Crankset FSA Omega Mega Exo 48/32 170 mm (XS / S) 172.5 mm (M / L) 175 mm (XL) Sram Red Carbon, 48 x 35T, 170 mm (50 / 52cm), 172.5 mm (54 / 56cm), 175 mm (58 / 60 cm)
Chain -- Sram Red D1
Shifters SHIMANO SORA (ST-R3000) --
Saddle CINELLI SSM Era Natural Fit Nuance SLT Road Carbon
Headset Internal 1-1 / 8 " --
Derailleur Front SHIMANO SORA (FD-R3000) --
Derailleur Rear SHIMANO SORA (RD-R3000) / 9 Speed Sram Red eTap AXS, 12-speed
Cassette SUNRACE / 9 Speed / 11-34T Sram Red XG-1290, 10-28T
Sprocket SUNRACE / 9 Speed / 11-34T --
Tyres
Front KENDA - FLINTRIDGE / 700 x 35c Schwalbe Pro One TT, Tubeless Easy, 25-622
Rear KENDA - FLINTRIDGE / 700 x 35c Schwalbe Pro One TT, Tubeless Easy, 25-622
Wheel / RIM -- DT Swiss ARC 1100 DICUT Carbon 62
Brakes
Front F&R TEKTRO (MD-C510) / Mechanical / 160 Rotor Sram Red eTap AXS (160/160)
Rear F&R TEKTRO (MD-C510) / Mechanical / 160 Rotor Sram Red eTap AXS (160/160)
Brake Lever -- Sram Red eTap AXS
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Orange juice blue Carbon & Prizmblack


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 7.6 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Tape : CINELLI Cork
Bottom Bracket : FSA / BSA 68 mm
Handlebar Tape : CUBE Grip Control
Tax Rate : ACROS, Top Integrated 1 1/8 ", Bottom Integrated 1 1/4"

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2621