Combat Wraith vs Suzuki Hayabusa 25th Anniversary Edition 2024

Compare Specifications of Combat Wraith and Suzuki Hayabusa 25th Anniversary Edition 2024

Selected Bikes

Combat Wraith
Combat Wraith

Brand:

Model:

Suzuki Hayabusa 25th Anniversary Edition 2024
Suzuki Hayabusa 25th Anniversary Edition 2024

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine 132 cubic inch (2,163cc) S&S X-Wedge 56-degree 1340cc, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, 4-cylinder, DOHC
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate type, SCAS-equipped
Fuel System -- Fuel injection with Ride-by-Wire throttle bodies
Ignition -- Electronic ignition (transistorized)
Cooling System Air cooled V-twin --
Maximum Power 1907 HP @ 5,100 RPM --
Maximum Torque 216 NM @ 2,000 RPM --
Transmission -- 6-speed constant mesh
Top Speed 257 kmph --
Frame Solid billet blocks of military-grade aluminum
Chassis: Machined aluminum monocoque, massive 7 in. curved Wraith backbone containing fuel load.
--
Headlamp -- Multi-plane and projector LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR19 120/70ZR17M/C (58W), tubeless
Rear 240/45ZR17 190/50ZR17M/C (73W), tubeless
Wheel / RIM Front wheel: 19 in. carbon
Rear wheel: 17 in. carbon disc
--
Brakes
Front -- Brembo Stylema, 4-piston, twin disc, ABS-equipped
Rear -- Nissin, 1-piston, single disc, ABS-equipped
Suspension
Front Double wishbone, monoshock , fully adjustable Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear Cantilever monoshock, fully adjustable Link type, single shock, coil spring, oil damped
Colors Available
Colors Silver
Black
Glass Blaze Orange & Glass Sparkle Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2180 mm
Width -- 735 mm
Height -- 1165 mm
Kerb Weight -- 264
Seat Height 749 800
Wheelbase 1587 mm 1480 mm
Ground Clearance -- 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 20 litres
Overview
Features Most robust, lightweight, fatigue-resistant Suzuki Hayabusa 25th Anniversary Edition 2024 Features
Additional Details 560 lb (wet) --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8162