CSC RZ3S Haylon 400 Midnight vs Lifan KP350 (LF350-2)

Compare Specifications of CSC RZ3S Haylon 400 Midnight and Lifan KP350 (LF350-2)

Selected Bikes

CSC RZ3S Haylon 400 Midnight
CSC RZ3S Haylon 400 Midnight

Brand:

Model:

Lifan KP350 (LF350-2)
Lifan KP350 (LF350-2)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 378.00 cc 349.50 cc
Engine Fuel-injected parallel-Twin, overhead camshafts, balance shaft Vertical Double Cylinder, Water-Cooled, Four-Stroke
Engine Starting -- Electric
Clutch -- Hand Clutched
Fuel System -- Electronic Fuel Injection
Cooling System Liquid-cooling --
Maximum Power 36.2 Ps @ 9000 Rpm 27 Ps @ 8000 Rpm
Maximum Torque 35 Nm @ 6500 Rpm 24 Nm @ 4500 Rpm
Transmission 6 Speed 6 Gears
Top Speed 155 kmph 140 kmph
Frame Steel trellis --
Fork Inverted adjustable fork --
Tyres
Front Tubeless 110/70-17 120/70 - 17
Rear Tubeless 150/60-17 160/60 - 17
Wheel / RIM Cast aluminum; 3.5x17F, 4.5x17R AI - Alloy
Brakes
Front Dual 300 mm rotors with four-piston calipers, braided steel brake lines, Bosch ABS Disc
Rear 258 mm rotor with single-piston caliper, braided steel brake lines, Bosch ABS Disc
Suspension
Front 41 mm inverted telescopic fork, 4.7 inches travel, damping adjustable to 16 positions --
Rear Preload-adjustable monoshock, 7 positions of damping, 3.5 inches travel --
Colors Available
Colors Smoky Gray Metallic with Racer Red frame
Midnight Matte Black with Matt Black frame
Pearl White
Special Black


Physical Specs
Length 2000 mm 2055 mm
Width 825 mm 765 mm
Height 1065 mm 1190 mm
Weight -- 187 kg
Kerb Weight 190 --
Seat Height 780 790
Wheelbase 1345 mm 1410 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features - Bosch dual-channel ABS
- Adjustable monoshock with rising-rate suspension linkage
- Stainless steel exhaust system
- Easy-to-read LCD digital instrumentation
- Up to 350 miles between gas stops
--
Additional Details Rake & : Trail: 25°, 100mm Motorcycle Model : LF350-2
Economical Fuel Consumption (L/100km) < 3.5

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

395