Dynamo Cruiser Electric Bike vs SCOTT Solace eRide 20

Compare Specifications of Dynamo Cruiser Electric Bike and SCOTT Solace eRide 20

Selected Bikes

Dynamo Cruiser Electric Bike
Dynamo Cruiser Electric Bike

Brand:

Model:

SCOTT Solace eRide 20
SCOTT Solace eRide 20

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor -- TQ HPR50 Mid Motor drive 50Nm max Torque / EU: 25kmh / US: 20mph
Range More than 50kms per charge --
Maximum Torque -- 50Nm
Load Carrying Capacity -- 120 kg
Battery 36 Volt 16 Amp lithium-ion battery TQ Internal 360Wh
Charger -- TQ 100-240V-4A
Display Digital TQ HPR
Frame Aluminum alloy frame Solace eRIDE Disc HMX
Stem -- Syncros Creston 2.0 Compact, Alloy
Handle Bar -- Syncros Creston 1.0 Compact, Carbon
Seats Velo 8030 seat Syncros Belcarra Regular 1.0
Seatpost -- Syncros Duncan SL D-shape iL
Crankset -- FSA eBike Alloy CK-746
Chain -- Shimano CN-M6100-12
Shifters -- Shimano 105 Di2 ST-R7170
24 Speed Electronic Shift System
Gear Shimano 7-speed gear system --
Headset -- Acros AIF-1135
Derailleur Front -- Shimano 105 Di2 FD-R7150
Electronic Shift System
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano 105 Di2 RD-R7150
24 Speed Electronic Shift System
Cassette -- Shimano CS-R7100,11-34
Chainrings -- FSA eBike 50-34 24 speed
Headlamp -- Syncros iL rear
Tyres
Front -- Schwalbe PRO ONE EVO Super Race
Rear -- Schwalbe PRO ONE EVO Super Race
Wheel / RIM Spoke Syncros Capital 1.0 40e Disc
24 Front 12x100mmTA /24 Rear 12x142mmTA
Brakes
Front Tektro disc brake Shimano BR-R7170 Hyd.Disc
Shimano SM-RT70 CL rotor 160
Rear Tektro disc brake Shimano BR-R7170 Hyd.Disc
Shimano SM-RT70 CL rotor 160
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 13.2 kg
Overview
Features - No licence required
- Suspension fork
- Strong aluminum alloy frame which will not rust
- Tyres work well on rail trails
- PAS 5 Level speed control
- Suspension fork
- Rear baggage carrier
- Walk assist mode
- Throttle control on right-hand grip
- Certified to EN15194 standard for both safety and quality
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8538