Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary vs Honda 2023 CB500X

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary vs Honda 2023 CB500X

Compare Specifications of Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary and Honda 2023 CB500X

Selected Bikes

Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Honda 2023 CB500X Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	449.00 cc	471.00 cc
Engine	Single cylinder 4 stroke, liquid cooled , Single camshaft - 4 valve	Liquid-cooled parallel-twin four-stroke
Engine Starting	Electric	--
Clutch	--	Slipper/assist clutch
Fuel System	Electronic Fuel injection - throttle body ø 40mm	PGM-FI with 34mm throttle bodies
Cooling System	Liquid cooled	--
Maximum Power	40 HP @ 7500 RPM	47 PS @ 8500 rpm
Maximum Torque	43 NM @ 6000 RPM	43 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Transmission	--	6 Speed
Drivetrain	--	520 O-ring-sealed chain; 15T/41T
Top Speed	--	180 kmph
Display	--	LCD screen

Tyres

Front	110/80 R19	110/80-19
Rear	140/80 R17	160/60-17
Wheel / RIM	Spoked with aluminum rims	Alloy

Brakes

Front	Floating brake disc 320 mm	Dual 296mm discs with four-piston calipers; ABS
Rear	Floating brake disc 230mm	240mm disc; ABS

Suspension

Front	Rebound damping regulation Front suspension travel: 150mm	41mm fork; 5.9-inch travel
Rear	Rebound damping regulation Rear suspension travel: 150mm	Pro-Link single shock with nine-position spring preload adjustability; 5.3-inch travel

Colors Available

Colors

--

Pearl Organic Green

Physical Specs

Length	2080 mm	--
Weight	150 kg	--
Kerb Weight	--	199.1
Seat Height	820	833.12
Wheelbase	1425 mm	1442.72 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	`12 litres	17.7 litres

Overview

About	--	Introducing the Honda 2023 CB500X. This adventure-style motorcycle comes with a powerful 471cc Read More
Features	--	--
Additional Details	Exhaust system : Dual exhaust by ARROW Fuel consumption: 4,2 l/100 km CO2 emission: 97 g/km Swingarm: In steel with variable section and progressive link	Rake: 27.5° Trail: 4.3 inches

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

9318