Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary vs VOGE 500DSX

Compare Specifications of Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary and VOGE 500DSX

Selected Bikes

Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary
Fantic Caballero 500 Anniversary

Brand:

Model:

VOGE 500DSX
VOGE 500DSX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 449.00 cc 471.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 stroke, liquid cooled , Single camshaft - 4 valve 4 Stroke, DOHC parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric Electric Start
Fuel System Electronic Fuel injection - throttle body ø 40mm BOSCH EFI
Ignition -- EFI
Cooling System Liquid cooled Water Cooled
Maximum Power 40 HP @ 7500 RPM 46.3 PS @ 8500rpm
Maximum Torque 43 NM @ 6000 RPM 44.5 Nm @ 7000rpm
Load Carrying Capacity -- 389 kg
Transmission -- 6 Speed
Drivetrain -- Chain
Top Speed -- 160 kmph
Display -- TFT display with tire pressure monitors & Bluetooth connectivity
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 28.3 kmpl
Tyres
Front 110/80 R19 110/80-19 Tubeless
Rear 140/80 R17 150/70-17 Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Spoked with aluminum rims 19" front and 17" rear spoked rims
Brakes
Front Floating brake disc 320 mm Hydraulic Disc
Rear Floating brake disc 230mm Hydraulic Disc
Suspension
Front Rebound damping regulation
Front suspension travel: 150mm
USD KAYABA Inverted Forks
Rear Rebound damping regulation
Rear suspension travel: 150mm
KAYABA monoshock
Colors Available
Colors -- Grey
Red
Black


Physical Specs
Length 2080 mm 2160 mm
Width -- 845 mm
Height -- 1380 mm
Weight 150 kg --
Seat Height 820 830
Wheelbase 1425 mm 1477 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity `12 litres 16.5 litres
Overview
About -- The VOGE 500DSX features a 471cc 4 Stroke, DOHC parallel twin engine with BOSCH EFI fuel system Read More
Features -- - Adjustable front screen
- USB charging port
- Optional luggage set providing over 100L of storage
Additional Details Exhaust system : Dual exhaust by ARROW
Fuel consumption: 4,2 l/100 km
CO2 emission: 97 g/km
Swingarm: In steel with variable section and progressive link
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9361