Fantic Caballero Rally 500 vs Yamaha 2024 WR450F

Compare Specifications of Fantic Caballero Rally 500 and Yamaha 2024 WR450F

Selected Bikes

Fantic Caballero Rally 500
Fantic Caballero Rally 500

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2024 WR450F
Yamaha 2024 WR450F

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 449.00 cc 450.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 stroke, liquid cooled,Euro5 4-valves, 4-stroke, Liquid-cooled, DOHC, Single cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Multi plate wet clutch Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System Electronic Fuel - throttle body ø 40mm Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 39.5 HP @ 7100 RPM --
Maximum Torque 43 Nm @ 6000 rpm --
Transmission -- 5-speed, Constant Mesh
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Frame CrMo steel central-tube frame Semi double cradle
Gear 6 --
Tyres
Front 110/80 R19 90/90-21 54R Tube type
Rear 140/80 R17 140/80-18 70R Tube type
Wheel / RIM Spoked with aluminum rims --
Brakes
Front Floating brake disc 320 mm 270mm hydraulic single disc
Rear brake disc 230 mm 240mm hydraulic single disc
ABS Continental two-channel ABS (disengageable) --
Suspension
Front 43mm upside down with hydraulic regulation
Front suspension travel:200 mm
KYB fork, fully adjustable inverted twin chamber with speed sensitive travel, 300mm travel
Rear with hydraulic regulation
with hydraulic regulation
Rear suspension travel: 200 mm
(Link type suspension), Swingarm, 306mm travel
Colors Available
Colors Army green
Sand
Icon Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2080 mm 2170 mm
Width -- 825 mm
Height -- 1265 mm
Weight -- 117 kg
Kerb Weight 150 --
Seat Height 860 955
Wheelbase 1435 mm 1470 mm
Ground Clearance -- 330 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 7.4 litres
Overview
About -- The 2024 Yamaha WR450F, a potent off-road motorcycle, commands attention with its 450cc, 4-stro Read More
Features -- --
Additional Details Exhaust system: Dual exhaust by ARROW
Fuel consumption: 4,2 l/100 km
CO2 emission: 97 g/km
Swingarm: In aluminum with variable section and progressive link
Caster angle: 26º
Trail: 109mm
Oil tank capacity: 1.2 L

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6640