Fantic XEF 125 Performance vs FB Mondial Spartan 125

Compare Specifications of Fantic XEF 125 Performance and FB Mondial Spartan 125

Selected Bikes

Fantic XEF 125 Performance
Fantic XEF 125 Performance

Brand:

Model:

FB Mondial Spartan 125
FB Mondial Spartan 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.60 cc 124.60 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 strokes Euro5, SOHC 4-valve, Variable camshaft timing Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC, 4 valves / Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC, 4 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric starter
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Wet multidisc, back-torque limiter --
Fuel System -- Electronic injection
Ignition Electronic --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Forced air
Maximum Power 15 PS @ 9.750 RPM 11.55 Ps @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque 11.8 NM @ 6750 RPM 9.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Transmission -- 5 speeds
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Frame Perimeter frame steel CrMo --
Handle Bar 22 steel --
Tyres
Front 90/90x21 110/70-17
Rear 120/90x18 130/70-17
Wheel / RIM Aluminium, black anodized Front wheel: 2.50×17″
Rear wheel: 3.5×13″
Brakes
Front Disc “Wave” ø260mm - combined brake system 3-piston radial caliper / 3 piston radial caliper – 298 mm, CBS
Rear Disc “Wave” ø220mm, combined brake system 1 piston floating caliper / 1 piston floating caliper – 210 mm CBS
Suspension
Front FANTIC ø41mm USD Fork Ø37 mm / Ø37 mm USD fork – ND
Rear FANTIC 125 – preload regulation 64 mm Double shock absorbers
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2110 mm 1960 mm
Width -- 810 mm
Height -- 1065 mm
Weight 112 kg --
Seat Height 915 800
Wheelbase 1420 mm 1350 mm
Ground Clearance -- 210 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.5 litres 15 litres
Overview
About -- The FB Mondial Spartan 125 features a 124.60 cc single-cylinder engine with a 4-stroke, SOHC co Read More
Features -- --
Additional Details Fuel consumption: 1,8 l/100 km
Swingarm: Steel, progressive link
Triple clamps: Forged aluminum
Exhaust:Manifold and muffler Euro5 by ARROW
CO2 Emission: 43 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9613