Giant Trinity Advanced Pro 1 Force vs Trek Marlin 4

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Giant Trinity Advanced Pro 1 Force vs Trek Marlin 4

Compare Specifications of Giant Trinity Advanced Pro 1 Force and Trek Marlin 4

Selected Bikes

Giant Trinity Advanced Pro 1 Force Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Trek Marlin 4 Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Load Carrying Capacity	--	Combined weight of bicycle, rider, and cargo of 300 pounds (136 kg)
Frame	Advanced-Grade Composite	Alpha Silver Aluminum, internal routing, chainstay disc brake mount, rack and kickstand mount, 135 x 5 mm QR
Stem	Trinity alloy, high/low stem	Size : XS - Bontrager alloy, 31.8 mm, Blendr compatible, 7 degree, 50 mm length ( Size : S - 60 mm length) Size : M - Bontrager alloy, 31.8 mm, Blendr compatible, 7 degree, 70 mm length Size : ML, L - Bontrager alloy, 31.8 mm, Blendr compatible, 7 degree, 80 mm length Size : XL, XXL - Bontrager alloy, 31.8 mm, Blendr compatible, 7 degree, 90 mm length
Handle Bar	Giant Trinity composite base barwith ski bend	Size : XS, S - Bontrager alloy, 31.8 mm, 5 mm rise, 690 mm width Size : M, ML, L, XL, XXL - Bontrager alloy, 31.8 mm, 5 mm rise, 720 mm width
Fork	Advanced-Grade Composite, alloy Over Drive steerer	Size : XS - SR Suntour XCE 28, coil spring, preload, 42 mm offset for 27.5'' wheel, 100 mm QR, 80 mm travel Size : S - SR Suntour XCE 28, coil spring, preload, 42 mm offset for 27.5'' wheel, 100 mm QR, 100 mm travel Size : M, ML, L, XL, XXL - SR Suntour XCE 28, coil spring, preload, 46 mm offset for 29'' wheel, 100 mm QR, 100 mm travel
Seatpost	Trinity composite	Size : XS, S - Bontrager alloy, 31.6 mm, 12 mm offset, 330 mm length Size : M - Bontrager alloy, 31.6 mm, 12 mm offset, 360 mm length Size : ML, L, XL, XXL - Bontrager alloy, 31.6 mm, 12 mm offset, 400 mm length
Grip	--	Bontrager XR Endurance Comp, lock-on
Crankset	SRAM Force D1 DUB 35/48 with Quarq power meter	Size : XS, S, M - Shimano Tourney TY301, 42/34/24, 170 mm length Size : ML, L, XL, XXL - Shimano Tourney TY301, 42/34/24, 175 mm length
Pedals	--	VP-536 nylon platform
Chain	SRAM Force D1	KMC Z7, 7 speed
Shifters	SRAM eTap Blips	Shimano Altus EF500, 7 speed
Saddle	ISM PS1.0	Bontrager Arvada, steel rails, 138 mm width
Headset	--	Semi-integrated, 1-1/8''
Derailleur Front	SRAM Force eTap AXS	Shimano Tourney TY300, 34.9 mm clamp, down swing, down pull
Derailleur Rear	SRAM Force eTap AXS	Shimano Tourney TY300, long cage, 34T max cog
Hub Front	Giant P-A2 wheelset	Formula DC-31, alloy, 6-bolt, 6/7/8 speed freewheel, 135 x 5 mm QR
Hub Rear	Giant P-A2 wheelset	Formula DC-20, alloy, 6-bolt, 5 x 100 mm QR
Spoke	Giant P-A2 wheelset	14g stainless steel
Cassette	SRAM Force, 12-speed, 10 x 28	Shimano TZ500, 14-28, 7 speed
Chainrings	--	1x/2x : 34T, 3x : 42T
Bottom Bracket	--	VP BC73, 73 mm, threaded cartridge

Tyres

Front	Giant Gavia Course AC 1, tubeless, 700 x 25, folding	Bontrager XR2 Comp, wire bead, 30 tpi, 29 x 2.20''
Rear	Giant Gavia Course AC 1, tubeless, 700 x 25, folding	Bontrager XR2 Comp, wire bead, 30 tpi, 29 x 2.00''
Wheel / RIM	Giant P-A2 wheelset	Bontrager Connection, double-wall, 32-hole, 20 mm width, schrader valve

Brakes

Front	Giant SpeedControl SL	Tektro MD-M280 mechanical disc, 160 mm rotor
Rear	Giant SpeedControl SL	Tektro MD-M280 mechanical disc, 160 mm rotor
Brake Lever	Giant Trinity	--

Suspension

Front	--	--
Rear	--	--

Colors Available

Colors

Chameleon Blue

Matte Trek Black Voodoo Aloha Green Matte Anthracite Magenta

Physical Specs

Length	--	--
Weight	--	13.98 kg

Overview

Features	- Aero efficiency - Integrated design - Perfect fit	- Rack Mounts - Rear Kickstand Mount - Internal Cable Routing
Additional Details	Bottom Bracket : SRAM DUB, press fit Extras : integrated hydration, integrated food storage, misc fairings, AeroVault system	Max compatible fork travel : 100 mm (XS & S: 490 mm axle-to-crown, M & up: 509 mm axle-to-crown)

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

5158