Harley Davidson 2022 CVO Road Glide vs Harley Davidson 2023 Softail Standard

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Harley Davidson 2022 CVO Road Glide vs Harley Davidson 2023 Softail Standard

Compare Specifications of Harley Davidson 2022 CVO Road Glide and Harley Davidson 2023 Softail Standard

Selected Bikes

Harley Davidson 2022 CVO Road Glide Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Harley Davidson 2023 Softail Standard Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	1917.00 cc	1745.00 cc
Engine	Milwaukee-Eight 117	Milwaukee-Eight™ 107
Fuel System	Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection (ESPFI)	Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection (ESPFI)
Maximum Power	--	144 Nm @ 3250 RPM
Maximum Torque	170 NM @ 3750 RPM	86 HP @ 5020 rpm
Drivetrain	--	Primary drive: Chain, 34/46 ratio Gear Ratios (Overall) 1st: 9.311 Gear Ratios (Overall) 2nd: 6.454 Gear Ratios (Overall) 3rd: 4.793 Gear Ratios (Overall) 4th: 3.882 Gear Ratios (Overall) 5th: 3.307 Gear Ratios (Overall) 6th:2.79
Display	Display features odometer, trip A, trip B, range to empty and gear indicator; and larger tell-tale indicators.	2.14 inch viewable area LCD display with speedometer, gear, odometer, fuel level, clock, trip, range and tachometer indication
Fork	49mm Dual Bending Valve	Front: Dual-bending valve 49 mm telescopic with aluminum fork triple clamps; dual rate spring
Headlamp	LED	All LED, Low Beam, High Beam & Signature Position Lamp, Incandescent Bullets
Taillamp	LED	LED

Fuel Economy

Overall Mileage

--

18 kmpl

Tyres

Front	BW 130/60B21 M/C63H Dunlop Harley-Davidson Series, bias blackwall	100/90B19,57H,BW Dunlop™ Harley-Davidson Series, bias blackwall front and rear
Rear	BW 180/55B18 M/C80H Dunlop Harley-Davidson Series, bias blackwall	150/80B16,77H,BW Dunlop™ Harley-Davidson Series, bias blackwall front and rear
Wheel / RIM	--	Silver, Annihilator cast aluminum

Brakes

Front	32 mm, 4-piston fixed Dual floating rotors	Type: Solid, uniform expansion rotors Caliper: 4-piston fixed front and 2-piston floating rear
Rear	32 mm, 4-piston fixed Fixed rotor	Type: Solid, uniform expansion rotors Caliper: 4-piston fixed front and 2-piston floating rear

Suspension

Front	Gloss Black and Contrast Chrome Combo	--
Rear	Gloss Black and Contrast Chrome Combo	Hidden, free piston, coil-over monoshock; 43mm stroke; cam-style preload adjustment

Colors Available

Colors

Wicked Orange Pearl Envious Green Fade Blue Steel

Vivid Black

Physical Specs

Length	2461 mm	2320 mm
Weight	390 kg	297 kg
Kerb Weight	405	291
Seat Height	658	680
Wheelbase	1626 mm	1630 mm
Ground Clearance	124 mm	125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	23 litres	13.2 litres

Overview

Features	- Milwaukee - Eight 117 V - Twin - Cast/Laced combo wheels - H-D Touring Chassis - Daymaker LED headlamp and bright LED lighting for enhanced visibility - Corner Safety Enhancements	- Upright riding position - Mid-mount foot controls - A2 compatible - City cruising or light touring with a low-slung stance - Milwaukee-Eight™ 107 V-Twin engine and easy-reach bars
Additional Details	RAKE : 26 TRAIL : 6.8 in. OIL CAPACITY (W/FILTER) : 5.2 qt. LUGGAGE CAPACITY -VOLUME : 2.4 cu ft EXHAUST : Dual, with crossover ENGINE TORQUE TESTING METHOD : J1349 LEAN ANGLE, RIGHT (DEG.) : 34 LEAN ANGLE, LEFT (DEG.) : 34 FUEL ECONOMY TESTING METHOD : Estimated City/Hwy FUEL ECONOMY : 41 mpg PRIMARY DRIVE : Chain, 34/46 ratio GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 1ST : 9.593 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 2ND : 6.65 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 3RD : 4.938 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 4TH : 4 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 5TH : 3.407 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 6TH : 2.875 REAR SHOCKS : Premium Low Hand-Adjustable Rear Suspension WHEELS, OPTIONAL STYLE TYPE : Denim Black with Contrast Gloss Black Combo; Gloss Black with Contrast Smoked Satin Combo	RAKE: 30 TRAIL: 157 mm OIL CAPACITY (W/FILTER): 4.7 l EXHAUST: 2-into-2 shotgun; catalyst in muffler LEAN ANGLE, RIGHT (DEG.): 28.5 LEAN ANGLE, LEFT (DEG.): 28.5 CO2 EMISSIONS: 128 g/km CO2

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

6230