Harley Davidson 2022 Electra Glide Standard vs Harley Davidson 2023 Low Rider S

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Harley Davidson 2022 Electra Glide Standard vs Harley Davidson 2023 Low Rider S

Compare Specifications of Harley Davidson 2022 Electra Glide Standard and Harley Davidson 2023 Low Rider S

Selected Bikes

Harley Davidson 2022 Electra Glide Standard Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Harley Davidson 2023 Low Rider S Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	1753.00 cc	1917.00 cc
Engine	Milwaukee-Eight 107	Milwaukee-Eight 117
Engine Starting	--	Electric
Fuel System	Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection (ESPFI)	Electronic Sequential Port Fuel Injection (ESPFI)
Maximum Torque	150 NM @ 3250 RPM	169.4 NM @ 3500
Drivetrain	--	Primary Drive: Chain, 34/46 Ratio Gear Ratios (Overall) 1st : 9.311 Gear Ratios (Overall) 2nd: 6.454 Gear Ratios (Overall) 3rd: 4.793 Gear Ratios (Overall) 4th: 4 Gear Ratios (Overall) 5th: 3.407 Gear Ratios (Overall) 6th: 2.79
Display	Display features odometer, trip A, trip B, range to empty and gear indicator; and larger tell-tale indicators	--
Fork	49 mm Dual Bending Valve	Single cartridge 43 mm inverted with aluminum fork triple clamps; triple rate spring
Headlamp	Dual halogen headlight	SIGNAL LIGHTS 8 All LED, low beam, high beam and signature position lamp, LED Zeppelin tail lamp, Incandescent bullet turn signals

Tyres

Front	BW 130/80B17 65H Dunlop Harley-Davidson Series, bias blackwall	110/90B19,62H,BW Michelin Scorcher "31" front and rear
Rear	BW 180/65B16 81H Dunlop Harley-Davidson Series, bias blackwall	180/70B16,77H,BW Michelin Scorcher "31" front and rear
Wheel / RIM	--	Front : Dark bronze, Radiate cast aluminum wheel Rear : Dark bronze, Radiate cast aluminum wheel

Brakes

Front	32 mm, 4-piston fixed Dual floating rotors	4-piston fixed black, Split 7-spoke floating rotors
Rear	32 mm, 4-piston fixed Fixed rotor	Split 7-spoke floating, 2-piston floating

Suspension

Front	Impeller Cast Aluminum	--
Rear	Impeller Cast Aluminum	--

Colors Available

Colors

Vivid Black

White Sand Pearl Vivid Black

Physical Specs

Length	2400 mm	2364 mm
Weight	354 kg	295 kg
Kerb Weight	372	--
Seat Height	663	685
Wheelbase	1626 mm	1615 mm
Ground Clearance	119 mm	144 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	23 litres	18.9 litres

Overview

About	--	The Harley Davidson 2023 Low Rider S is a motorcycle designed for aggressive riding with sport Read More
Features	- MILWAUKEE-EIGHT BIG TWIN ENGINE - MINIMALIST APPROACH - REFLEX LINKED BREMBO BRAKES WITH STANDARD ABS - BATWING FAIRING AND MID-HEIGHT WINDSHIELD - EMULSION-TECHNOLOGY REAR SHOCK ABSORBERS	- Aggressive riding with sport bike agility and handling - Milwaukee-Eight 117 V-Twin engine and moto-style drag bars - Mid-mount foot controls - Upright riding position - Electronic Cruise Control - High-performance engine Gauges - 4-inch analog tachometer with digital speedometer, gear, odometer, fuel level, clock, trip and range indication Display FXLRS badge cover and a throw-back dropped “H” logo–like that seen on early H-D race bikes–adorns each side of the tank.
Additional Details	RAKE : 26 TRAIL : 6.7 in. OIL CAPACITY (W/FILTER) : 5 qt. EXHAUST : Chrome, 2-1-2 dual exhaust with tapered mufflers ENGINE TORQUE TESTING METHOD : J1349 LEAN ANGLE, RIGHT (DEG.) : 31 LEAN ANGLE, LEFT (DEG.) : 29 FUEL ECONOMY TESTING METHOD : Estimated City/Hwy FUEL ECONOMY : 43 mpg PRIMARY DRIVE : Chain, 34/46 ratio GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 1ST : 9.593 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 2ND : 6.65 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 3RD : 4.938 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 4TH : 4 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 5TH : 3.407 GEAR RATIOS (OVERALL) 6TH : 2.875 REAR SHOCKS : Premium Low Hand-Adjustable Rear Suspension	Exhaust : 2-into-2 offset shotgun; catalyst in muffler Lean Angle, Right (Deg.): 34.3 Lean Angle, Left (Deg.): 33.4 Fuel Economy Testing Method: Estimated City/Hwy Fuel Economy : 5.41 Mpg Rearshocks: Hidden, free piston, coil-over monoshock; 56 mm stroke; hydraulic preload adjustment

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

2642