Honda 2023 CRF300LS vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3

Compare Specifications of Honda 2023 CRF300LS and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3

Selected Bikes

Honda 2023 CRF300LS
Honda 2023 CRF300LS

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3
Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 286.00 cc 321.00 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled single-cylinder four-stroke, DOHC; four-valves per cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Transmission Six-speed 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Drivetrain Final Drive : #520 chain; 14T/40T Final Drive: Chain
Headlamp LED --
Tyres
Front 80/100-21 110/70-17 Dunlop® Sportmax GPR-300F
Rear 120/80-18 140/70-17 Dunlop® Sportmax GPR-300R
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front Single 256mm disc with twin-piston caliper 298mm hydraulic disc with ABS
Rear Single 220mm disc 220mm hydraulic disc with ABS
Suspension
Front 43mm inverted fork; 9.3-inch travel Inverted telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel
Rear Pro-Link® single shock with adjustable spring preload; 9.0-inch travel  Monocross single shock, adjustable preload; 4.9- in travel
Colors Available
Colors Swift Gray Team Yamaha Blue
Midnight Black


Physical Specs
Length 1440 mm 2090 mm
Width 830 mm 728 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Kerb Weight 141 --
Seat Height -- 779
Wheelbase -- 1379 mm
Ground Clearance 243 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8 litres 14 litres
Overview
About Honda has recently launched its latest offering in the adventure bike segment, the 2023 CRF300L Read More --
Features - DOUBLE-OVERHEAD-CAM CONSTRUCTION
- SINGLE-CYLINDER ENGINE
- LOWER SEATING POSITION
- CRF450R-INSPIRED BODYWORK
- INTEGRATED REAR MASTER CYLINDER
- COMFORTABLE SEATING POSITION
- FRONT AND REAR WHEELS
- DISC BRAKES
The compact multi-function meter informs the rider of gear position, fuel capacity, real time and average fuel economy, water temp, clock, and an oil change trip meter.
LED Lighting
Compact Exhaust System
Strong, Lightweight Pistons
Additional Details Induction: Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI); 38mm throttle body 
Rake (Caster Angle) : 27.5°
Trail: 4.3 inches
Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 3.7 in
Fuel Economy: 56 mpg
Wet Weight: 375 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1938