Honda CBR650R vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Honda CBR650R vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Honda CBR650R and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Honda CBR650R Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	649.00 cc	689.00 cc
Engine	Liquid-cooled 4-stroke 16-valve DOHC inline-4	Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Engine Starting	Electric	--
Clutch	Assist/Slipper	--
Fuel System	PGM-FI	Fuel injection
Cooling System	Liquid Cooled	--
Transmission	6 speed	6-speed; multiplate wet clutch; with Assist & Slipper clutch
Gear Shift Pattern	1-N-2-3-4-5-6	--
Drivetrain	--	Final Drive: Chain

Tyres

Front	120/70-17	120/70ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22F
Rear	180/55-17	180/55ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22R
Wheel / RIM	Alloy	--

Brakes

Front	2x 310 mm discs, ABS	298mm dual disc hydraulic with ABS
Rear	1x 240 mm disc, ABS	245mm disc hydraulic with ABS

Suspension

Front	41mm Showa Separate Function Fork (SFF) inverted fork, 108 mm travel	Telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel, adjustable for preload, rebound and compression
Rear	pro-link with adjustable pre-load, 128 mm travel	Linked-type Monocross shock, adjustable preload and rebound; 5.1-in travel

Colors Available

Colors

Grand Prix Red and Matte Gunpowder Black Metallic

Heritage White/Redline

Physical Specs

Length	2130 mm	2070 mm
Width	750 mm	706 mm
Height	1150 mm	1160 mm
Weight	207 kg	--
Seat Height	--	835
Wheelbase	1450 mm	1394 mm
Ground Clearance	130 mm	134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	15.4 litres	13 litres

Overview

Features	--	Digital LCD Instrumentation Linear Torque with Smooth Acceleration Quick Shift System for Smooth Upshifts Strong, Lightweight Pistons
Additional Details	--	Rake (Caster Angle): 23.7° Trail: 3.5 in Fuel Economy: 58 MPG Wet Weight: 414 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

1747