Honda Giorno vs Juneng Bravo S 50

Compare Specifications of Honda Giorno and Juneng Bravo S 50

Selected Bikes

Honda Giorno
Honda Giorno

Brand:

Model:

Juneng Bravo S 50
Juneng Bravo S 50

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 49.00 cc 50.00 cc
Engine AF74E / water-cooled 4-stroke OHC single cylinder --
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Foot start/electric start
Fuel System Electronic type --
Ignition Full transistor battery ignition splash
Cooling System Water-cooled Air cooling
Maximum Power 4.5 PS @ 8000 RPM 2.9 Ps @ 3000 Rpm
Maximum Torque 4.1 NM @ 6000 RPM 2.8 Nm @ 5500 Rpm
Load Carrying Capacity -- 75 Kg
Transmission Continuously variable transmission (V-matic) --
Top Speed -- 45 kmph
Battery -- 12V 7Ah
Display Clock display --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 80 / 100-10 46J 3.50-10
Rear 80 / 100-10 46J 3.50-10
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front -- 180 mm Disc
Rear -- 110 mm Drum
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Virgin beige
Pearl Deep Mud Gray
Matt Armored Green Metallic
Puco Blue
--


Physical Specs
Length 1650 mm 1780 mm
Width 670 mm 650 mm
Height 1035 mm 1120 mm
Weight 81 kg 97 kg
Seat Height 720 --
Wheelbase 1180 mm 1260 mm
Ground Clearance 105 mm 110 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 4.5 litres 6.8 litres
Overview
About -- The Juneng Bravo S 50 is a modest scooter with an engine displacement of 50.00 cc. It offers th Read More
Features - Elegant chic individual style
- Fuel-efficient engine "eSP" with light driving
- Automatically stops the engine and contributes to fuel efficiency and the environment
- Well-balanced braking gives you plenty of room for driving
- Convenient storage of helmets and small items
- Charging your smartphone
- Large multi-reflector headlight & tail lamp
- Push-cancel type turn signal switch
- Seat opener switch that can be opened with one touch
- Maintenance-free battery that does not require refilling
- Center stand that can be hung with light force
--
Additional Details Fuel consumption rate * 2: 80.0 km / L
Minimum turning radius (m): 1.8 1.8
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4666