Husqvarna TE 300 Pro vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Husqvarna TE 300 Pro and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Husqvarna TE 300 Pro
Husqvarna TE 300 Pro

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition
Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 293.20 cc 321.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Clutch Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics --
Fuel System -- Fuel injection
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel --
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front -- 110/70-17 Dunlop® Sportmax GPR-300F
Rear -- 140/70-17 Dunlop® Sportmax GPR-300R
Brakes
Front Disc 298mm hydraulic disc with ABS
Rear Disc 220mm hydraulic disc with ABS
Suspension
Front WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm Inverted telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel
Rear WP XACT Monoshock with linkage Monocross single shock, adjustable preload; 4.9- in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Heritage White/Rapid Red


Physical Specs
Length -- 2090 mm
Width -- 728 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Weight 108.5 kg --
Seat Height 952 779
Wheelbase -- 1379 mm
Ground Clearance 354 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8.5 litres 14 litres
Overview
About The Husqvarna TE 300 Pro is a high-performance off-road motorcycle featuring a 293.20 cc 2-stro Read More --
Features -- The compact multi-function meter informs the rider of gear position, fuel capacity, real time and average fuel economy, water temp, clock, and an oil change trip meter.
High-Revving Supersport Engine
Strong, Lightweight Pistons
Compact Exhaust System
Potent Braking with ABS
Additional Details EMS - Vitesco Technologies EMS Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 3.7 in
Fuel Economy: 56 mpg
Wet Weight: 375 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7314