Ibis Hakka MX vs Norco Search XR S2

Compare Specifications of Ibis Hakka MX and Norco Search XR S2

Selected Bikes

Ibis Hakka MX
Ibis Hakka MX

Brand:

Model:

Norco Search XR S2
Norco Search XR S2

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Drivetrain 1X or 2X compatible, Di2 compatible, up to 48t 1X chainring, 34t minimum --
Frame Carbon fiber monocoque
Frame Weight : 1000g
Reynolds 725 Chromoly Steel
Stem -- Norco SL Aluminum - Custom Painted
Handle Bar -- Norco Super Flare Aluminum, 16deg Flare
Fork -- Mid-Modulus Carbon
Seatpost 31.6mm / Dropper Post Compatible Norco SL Aluminum
Grip -- Norco Griptacular Shockproof
Crankset -- Shimano GRX FC-RX600 46/30T
Chain -- KMC X10
Shifters -- Front: Shimano GRX ST-RX400 10 speed
Rear: Shimano GRX ST-RX400 2 speed
Saddle -- Norco SL Race, Cromo Rails
Headset -- FSA 44mm Cartridge Bearing
Derailleur Front -- Shimano GRX FD-RX400
Derailleur Rear 34.9mm clamp, bottom pull Shimano GRX RD-RX400
Hub Front -- Shimano HB-RS470 12x100mm TA
Hub Rear -- Shimano FH-RS470 12x142mm TA
Spoke -- Sapim Race Butted, Black, Black Brass Nipples
Cassette -- Shimano CS-HG50-10 11-36T
Bottom Bracket T47 Threaded Bottom Bracket Shimano BB-RS500 PressFit BB86
Tyres
Front -- WTB Resolute TCS 700x42c, Tubeless Compatible System, Tanwall
Rear -- WTB Resolute TCS 700x42c, Tubeless Compatible System, Tanwall
Wheel / RIM Wheel Size : 700c or 650b/27.5" WTB ST Light i23 TCS 2.0, Black, Tubeless Ready
Brakes
Front Flat-mount front disc, 160mm rotor (some images show post mount) Shimano GRX BR-RX400 Hydraulic Disc
Rear Flat-mount rear disc, 160mm rotor Shimano GRX BR-RX400 Hydraulic Disc
Brake Lever -- Shimano GRX RX400 Hydraulic
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Bone White/Teal, Coal or Fireball Steller's Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Rear Axle : 142 mm x 12 mm thru-axle
Front Axle : 100 mm x 12 mm thru-axle
Chainstay Length : 430 mm
Tapered Headtube : IS 41/28.6 upper, IS 52/40 lower
Sizes : 49 / 53 / 55 / 58 / 61
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1279