Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance vs KTM 450 SX-F 2025

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance and KTM 450 SX-F 2025

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance
Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Brand:

Model:

KTM 450 SX-F 2025
KTM 450 SX-F 2025

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 399.00 cc 449.90 cc
Engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric starter
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump --
Clutch Wet multi-disc, manual Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 --
Cooling System Liquid-cooled --
Maximum Power 45 PS @ 10000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 38 NM @ 8000 RPM --
Transmission 6-speed 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Frame Trellis, high-tensile steel Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Chain -- 520, Non-sealed
Tyres
Front 110/70R17 M/C 54H --
Rear 150/60R17 M/C 66H --
Wheel / RIM Alloy --
Brakes
Front Single semi-floating 310 mm petal discs. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston Disc - 260 mm
Rear Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual-piston Disc - 220 mm
Suspension
Front 41mm telescopic fork WP XACT-USD (AER), Ø 48 mm
Rear Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors Lime green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Metallic Spark Black / Lime Green
--


Physical Specs
Length 1990 mm --
Width 710 mm --
Height 1120 mm --
Weight -- 102.6 kg
Kerb Weight 168 --
Seat Height 785 958
Wheelbase 1370 mm --
Ground Clearance 140 mm 343 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 7.2 litres
Overview
Features - Akrapovic Sports Exhaust --
Additional Details Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.219 (71/32)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.929 (41/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 2.056 (37/18)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.619 (34/21)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.333 (32/24)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.154 (30/26)
Gear Ratios 6th : 1.037 (28/27)
Final reduction ratio : 2.929 (41/14)
CO2 emission : 100 g/km
Trail : 92 mm
Wheel travel front : 120 mm
Wheel travel rear : 130 mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2755