Kawasaki W800 Cafe vs KTM 690 Enduro R

Compare Specifications of Kawasaki W800 Cafe and KTM 690 Enduro R

Selected Bikes

Kawasaki W800 Cafe
Kawasaki W800 Cafe

Brand:

Model:

KTM 690 Enduro R
KTM 690 Enduro R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 773.00 cc 693.00 cc
Engine Air-cooled, 4-stroke Vertical Twin,SOHC, 8 valves Liquid cooled, 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric starter
Engine Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps
Clutch Wet multi-disc, manual PASC (TM) slipper clutch, hydraulically actuated
Fuel System Fuel injection: Ø 34 mm x 2 --
Ignition Digital Twin ignition
Cooling System Air-cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 48 PS @ 6000 RPM --
Maximum Torque 62.9 NM @ 4800 RPM --
Transmission 5-speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Double-cradle, high-tensile steel Chrome-moly tubular space frame, powder-coated
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/90-18M/C 56H --
Rear 130/80-18M/C 66H --
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front Single 320 mm disc. Caliper: Twin-piston Disc brake
Rear Single 270 mm disc. Caliper: Twin-piston Disc brake
ABS -- Bosch 9.1 MP
Suspension
Front 41 mm telescopic fork WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear Twin shocks with spring preload adjustability WP XPLOR with Pro-Lever linkage
Colors Available
Colors Metallic Magnesium Grey / Galaxy Silver Orange


Physical Specs
Length 2135 mm --
Width 825 mm --
Height 1135 mm --
Kerb Weight 223 --
Seat Height 790 --
Wheelbase 1465 mm --
Ground Clearance 130 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres --
Overview
Features - Sculpted Fuel Tank
- Classic Upright Riding Style
- Twin Seat
- Traditional Instrumentation
- ABS
- A2 Complaint with Powerdown Kit (EURO 4)
--
Additional Details Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.095 (88/42)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.353 (40/17)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.591 (35/22)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.240 (31/25)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.000 (28/28)
Gear Ratios 5th : 0.852 (23/27)
Final reduction ratio : 2.467 (37/15)
Trail : 94 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 107 mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2869