Kettler Quadriga DUO CX Speed vs RKS GT25

Compare Specifications of Kettler Quadriga DUO CX Speed and RKS GT25

Selected Bikes

Kettler Quadriga DUO CX Speed
Kettler Quadriga DUO CX Speed

Brand:

Model:

RKS GT25
RKS GT25

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Mid-mounted engine RKS 36V 250W
Range -- 30-35 km
Charging Time -- 4 - 6 Hours
Engine Bosch Performance Line Speed 45/85Nm --
Load Carrying Capacity Max Weight Allowed : 145 Kg Max Weight : 124 Kg
Top Speed -- 25 kmph
Battery 2x Bosch Powertube 625 36V 7.8Ah
Display Bosch Kiox LCD 861
Frame Material : Alloy 20” Steel Folding
Stem Humpert Ergotec Swell-XR --
Handle Bar Humpert Ergotec ERGO PLUS XL Lv6 --
Fork SR Suntour XCR34, Air Suspension
Seatpost Limotec A3Z suspension dropper post (140 x 34,9 mm) --
Crankset FSA CK-320 40T 152 mm
Pedals Zecure VP-831P --
Chain -- KYC410*98L
Shifters Enviolo CT -2200 Shimano ASLTX30R6AT
Saddle Zecure L VL-3567 Comfortable
Derailleur Front Stepless gearhub --
Derailleur Rear Stepless gearhub Shimano ARDTY21ASSMBS 6SP
Hub Front Enviolo TR --
Hub Rear Shimano HB-MT400-B --
Spoke Spoke 2.0 blk --
Headlamp -- 36V Controled By Display
Taillamp -- Plastic LED
Tyres
Front 29 x 2.45, Overcome Intercorsa Kenda 20”*1.95 K1088
Rear 29 x 2.45, Overcome Intercorsa Kenda 20”*1.95 K1088
Wheel / RIM Rodi TRYP35, 29 inch 20”*1.95 Alloy Double Wall
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc, Magura MT5e / 4-piston YC-MK6.4 Disc
Rear Hydraulic disc, Magura MT5e / 4-piston YC-MK6.4 Disc
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Black matt / black shiny White
Black
Green


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 24 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Frame Size : 45cm, 50Cm, 55Cm
Belt : Gates CDX 122T black/ black
Front Lightning Set : Supernova M99 Mini Pro -45, 250 lux
Rear Lightning Set : Supernova M99
Mudguards : Curana Apollo 70
Carrier : IRack 2
Fender : Steel Matte Black
Electronic Cable : Waterproof Harness
Freewheel : Shimano AMFT5006428

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1216