Kross Vento JR 2.0 vs Norco Search XR A2

Compare Specifications of Kross Vento JR 2.0 and Norco Search XR A2

Selected Bikes

Kross Vento JR 2.0
Kross Vento JR 2.0

Brand:

Model:

Norco Search XR A2
Norco Search XR A2

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Speed 14 --
Frame ALUMINUM LITE Butted Aluminum, Smooth Welds
Stem ALUMINIUM 60 MM/31,8/7° Norco SL Aluminum, 31.8mm Clamp, 70mm (49), 80mm (52), 90mm (55), 100mm (58), 110mm (61)
Handle Bar ALUMINIUM 380 MM 31.8 Norco Super Flare Aluminum, 16 Degree Flare, 40cm (49), 42cm (52), 44cm (55), 46cm (58, 61)
Fork ALUMINIUM Full Carbon, Through Axle
Seatpost -- Aluminum 27.2mm
Grip -- Griptacular Shockproof Tape
Crankset FIRST DA FSA Omega Modular 46/30 AGX+, 170mm (49, 52), 172.5mm (55, 58), 175mm (61)
Pedals FP-917N City Resin
Chain KMC HV-500 KMC X10
Shifters SHIMANO TOURNEY A070 Shimano Tiagra ST-4700
Saddle VELO VL-50950 Selle Royal Gravel with Cutout
Headset FSA NO.11AGY 1-1/8" Sealed Cartridge Bearing
Derailleur Front SHIMANO TOURNEY A070 Shimano GRX FD-RX400
Derailleur Rear SHIMANO TOURNEY A070 Shimano GRX RD-RX400 Shadow RD+
Hub Front GL-B01R-QR 12x100mm Through Axle, 6 Bolt
Hub Rear GL-B01F-QR 12x142mm Through Axle, HG, 6 Bolt
Spoke -- Sapim Leader, Black
Cassette SHIMANO MF TZ500 Shimano CS-HG50, 11-36T, 10 Speed
Chainrings 46T-34T/155 MM --
Bottom Bracket FIRST F2001-E FSA BB386EVO for BSA
Tyres
Front SCHWALBE PRO ONE Vittoria Terreno Dry 700x38c
Rear SCHWALBE PRO ONE Vittoria Terreno Dry 700x38c
Wheel / RIM KROSS Alloy Pinned, 28H, 23mm ID
Brakes
Front TEKTRO R312 Tektro MD-C550 Dual-Piston Mechanical Disc, Resin Pads
Rear TEKTRO R312 Tektro MD-C550 Dual-Piston Mechanical Disc, Resin Pads
Brake Lever SHIMANO TOURNEY A070 Shimano Tiagra ST-4700
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Black / Lime / Graphite Glossy Beige/Grey


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 12.5 kg --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Freewheel Range : 14-28T
Saddle Bracket : Aluminium 27,2 X 300
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5266