KTM 300 XC-W 2024 vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3

Compare Specifications of KTM 300 XC-W 2024 and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3

Selected Bikes

KTM 300 XC-W 2024
KTM 300 XC-W 2024

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3
Yamaha 2022 YZF-R3

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 293.15 cc 321.00 cc
Engine 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Clutch Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Brembo hydraulics --
Fuel System Electronically Controlled Throttle Body Injection (TBI) Fuel injection
Transmission 6-speed 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Battery 2 Ah Li-ion battery --
Frame Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel --
Chain 520 X-Ring --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front Dunlop MX33 110/70-17 Dunlop® Sportmax GPR-300F
Rear Dunlop AT 81 140/70-17 Dunlop® Sportmax GPR-300R
Wheel / RIM High Strength GIANT Alloy Wheels --
Brakes
Front 260 mm Disc Brake 298mm hydraulic disc with ABS
Rear 220 mm Disc Brake 220mm hydraulic disc with ABS
Suspension
Front WP XACT closed cartridge dia. 48 mm Inverted telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel
Rear WP Xplor PDS shock absorber Monocross single shock, adjustable preload; 4.9- in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Team Yamaha Blue
Midnight Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 2090 mm
Width -- 728 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Seat Height -- 779
Wheelbase -- 1379 mm
Ground Clearance -- 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 14 litres
Overview
Features - Off-Road Control Unit
- Selectable Engine Maps (Map 1 is the standard, more linear, and predictable power map, while map 2 is a more aggressive map for added throttle response and more crisp, explosive power output.)
The compact multi-function meter informs the rider of gear position, fuel capacity, real time and average fuel economy, water temp, clock, and an oil change trip meter.
LED Lighting
Compact Exhaust System
Strong, Lightweight Pistons
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 3.7 in
Fuel Economy: 56 mpg
Wet Weight: 375 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1355