KYMCO AK 550 2022 vs Yamaha 2022 TMAX

Compare Specifications of KYMCO AK 550 2022 and Yamaha 2022 TMAX

Selected Bikes

KYMCO AK 550 2022
KYMCO AK 550 2022

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 TMAX
Yamaha 2022 TMAX

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 550.40 cc 562.00 cc
Engine DOHC 4-Stroke, 8-Valve, In-line Twin Liquid-cooled, parallel 2-cylinder, EURO5, 4-stroke, 4 valves, DOHC
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Dry sump
Fuel System Fuel Injection Petrol injection
Ignition Electric Transistor
Cooling System Liquid Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 53hp@7500 rpm 47.6 PS 2 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 55 nm @5500 rpm 55.7 NM @ 5250 RPM
Transmission CVT Automatic V-belt automatic
Display -- 7-inch TFT Color Display
Seats Underseat Storage --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 120/70-15 120 / 70R15M / C 56H (tubeless)
Rear 160/60-15 160 / 60R15M / C 67H (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Dual Disc 267 mm Hydraulic double disc brake,
Rear Hydraulic Disc 267 mm Hydraulic disc brake
Suspension
Front 41mm Up-Side Down Fork 120 mm Telescopic fork
Rear Horizontal Trailing Arm Rear Suspension 117 mm Swing arm
Colors Available
Colors Space Grey
Matt Silver Crystal
Deep Blue
Matt Black
Extreme Yellow
Sword Grey
Icon Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2164 mm 2195 mm
Width 795 mm 780 mm
Height 1399 mm 1415 mm
Weight 209.9 kg 218 kg
Seat Height 785 800
Wheelbase 1580 mm 1575 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features -- - New, networked TFT color display, navigation system with complete map material-
- Powerful, EURO5-compliant engine
- New, sporty, dynamic fairing design
- New projector headlights, integrated indicators
- Improved ergonomics for the driver and front passenger
- Smart Key - keyless operation
- Light aluminum chassis
- Demanding, electronic control technology
- Generously dimensioned storage space
- Anti-theft main stand
Additional Details Underseat Storage Fuel consumption: 4.8 L / 100 km
CO2 emission : 112 g / km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4568