Lexmoto Diablo 125 vs Lifan HERO 125 (LF125-26B(III)/(IV))

• Home ››
• Bikes ››
• Bike Comparison ››
• Lexmoto Diablo 125 vs Lifan HERO 125 (LF125-26B(III)/(IV))

Compare Specifications of Lexmoto Diablo 125 and Lifan HERO 125 (LF125-26B(III)/(IV))

Selected Bikes

Lexmoto Diablo 125 Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Lifan HERO 125 (LF125-26B(III)/(IV)) Brand: -- Select Brand -- / Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Brand: -- Select Brand -- Model: -- Select Model --

Technical Specifications

Fuel	Petrol	Petrol
Engine Displacement	125.00 cc	119.70 cc
Engine	Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke Engine	Single Cylinder, Air Cooled, Four Stroke
Engine Starting	Electric Start	Electric/Kick Start
Clutch	--	Auto Clutched
Fuel System	Fuel Injection	--
Ignition	EFI	--
Cooling System	Air Cooled	--
Maximum Power	8.6 PS @ 7500rpm	8 Ps @ 7500 Rpm
Maximum Torque	8.6Nm @ 6000rpm	8.5 Nm @ 5000 Rpm
Load Carrying Capacity	274 Kg	--
Transmission	--	4 Gears
Drivetrain	Belt	--
Top Speed	105 kmph	90 kmph
Battery	12V	--
Display	Digi-Analog Display	--
Headlamp	LED	--
Taillamp	LED	--

Tyres

Front	120/60-13, CST Tubeless	2.50-17
Rear	130/60-13, CST Tubeless	2.75-17
Wheel / RIM	13" Wheel	Spoke

Brakes

Front	Hydraulic Disc	Disc
Rear	Hydraulic Disc	Drum

Suspension

Front	Telescopic Forks	--
Rear	Single Shock Absorber	--

Colors Available

Colors

White/Red Black/Red Grey/Blue

--

Physical Specs

Length	1840 mm	1945 mm
Width	690 mm	835 mm
Height	1150 mm	1095 mm
Weight	114 kg	100 kg
Seat Height	790	770
Wheelbase	1305 mm	1260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	6 litres	3.7 litres

Overview

About	The Lexmoto Diablo 125 has a 125cc engine, 8.6 PS power, 8.6Nm torque, and reaches a top speed Read More	--
Features	LED Headlight Digi-Analog Display Single Shock Absorber LED Break light Hydraulic Disc Brake Under Seat Storage Space	- Classic Muffler Protective Shield - Sporty Hand Guards - Under Cowl for engine Protection - Motocross - Style Front Fenders - New Taillight Design
Additional Details	--	Economical Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 1.6

Which one do you think is better? And why?

Name :

Comment :

5010