Malaguti Drakon125 vs WMoto Cub Classic 110

Compare Specifications of Malaguti Drakon125 and WMoto Cub Classic 110

Selected Bikes

Malaguti Drakon125
Malaguti Drakon125

Brand:

Model:

WMoto Cub Classic 110
WMoto Cub Classic 110

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.80 cc 109.20 cc
Engine 1 cylinder, 4-stroke, water cooled 1-Cylinder, 4 Stroke, SOHC, Air Cooled
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Ignition ECU --
Cooling System -- Air Cooled
Maximum Power 13.4 PS @ 9500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 11.4 Nm @ 7500 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity 320 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 6-speed manual transmission --
Top Speed 99 kmph --
Battery -- 12V-4Ah
Display Colour TFT display Digital
Frame -- Arch bar truck
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 38 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 70/90-17, Tube
Rear 130/70-17 80/90-17, Tube
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2,75x17
Rear Rim: 3,50x17
Alloy
Brakes
Front 300mm Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc --
Rear 218mm hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc Drum
Suspension
Front Upside-down shock absorber USD Forks
Rear Single shock absorber Shock Absorber
Colors Available
Colors -- Matte Red
Matte Green
Matte Black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm --
Width 810 mm --
Height 1100 mm --
Weight -- 100 kg
Seat Height -- 755
Wheelbase -- 1235 mm
Ground Clearance -- 135 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.5 litres --
Overview
Features - Smart electronic fuel injection
- MAXXIS tyres
- Upside-down fork
- LED turn signals
- USB socket with dual output
- High-resolution color TFT display
Malaguti Drakon125
High-resolution color TFT display
- Aluminium Carrier With Seat
- Under Seat Fuel Tank
- LED Headlamp
- Digital Meter
- New Genaration 110cc Engine
- USD Fork
- USB Socket
- Sport Rim
- Luggage Basket
- Special Edition
- LED Signal Indicator

LED Headlamp
LED Headlamp
LED Signal Indicator
LED Signal Indicator
Wmoto Cub Classic 110
Luggage Basket
Additional Details C02 Emission: 59 g/km --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8667