Mash Dirt Track 650 vs Yamaha XSR700 XTribute

Compare Specifications of Mash Dirt Track 650 and Yamaha XSR700 XTribute

Selected Bikes

Mash Dirt Track 650
Mash Dirt Track 650

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XSR700 XTribute
Yamaha XSR700 XTribute

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 647.00 cc 689.00 cc
Engine 4T, SOHC, 4 valves 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, DOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, Multiple Disc
Fuel System Electronic Delphi --
Ignition Electronic TCI
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 40 HP @ 6000 RPM 74.8 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque 45.11 @ 4500 RPM 68.0 NM @ 6500 RPM
Transmission 5 Speed Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame -- Diamond
Tyres
Front 120/80-18 120/70 ZR 17M/C(58V) (Tubeless)
Rear 130/80-18 180/55 ZR 17M/C(73V) (Tubeless)
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front 320 mm Disk 4 pistons caliper Hydraulic dual disc, Ø282 mm
Rear 240 mm Disk 2 pistons caliper Hydraulic single disc, Ø245 mm
ABS ABS disconnectable --
Suspension
Front 41 mm Hydraulic Inverted Fork Telescopic forks
Rear -- Swingarm, (Link type suspension)
Colors Available
Colors Black
Grey
Tech Black


Physical Specs
Length 2080 mm 2075 mm
Width 890 mm 865 mm
Height 1170 mm 1120 mm
Weight 163 kg 188 kg
Seat Height 780 845
Wheelbase -- 1405 mm
Ground Clearance -- 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features -- - Off-road handlebars and chunky footrests
- Iconic XT-inspired colours and graphics
- Special XT-style flat seat and fork gaiters
- Pirelli MT60RS tyres, smooth on- and off-road riding
- Classic cool scrambler with modern technology
- Special instruments and radiator protectors
- Optional Akrapovič black high-level exhaust
Additional Details -- Limited power version : 35.0kW
Final transmission : ChainFuel
consumption : 4.3l/100km
CO2 emission : 100g/km
Caster angle : 24º50
Trail : 90mm
Remark : EU4 compliant
Oil tank capacity : 2.7L

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5195