Mission RV Child Transporter vs Nijland Nando Too

Compare Specifications of Mission RV Child Transporter and Nijland Nando Too

Selected Bikes

Mission RV Child Transporter
Mission RV Child Transporter

Brand:

Model:

Nijland Nando Too
Nijland Nando Too

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity -- 180 kg
Frame Powder coated frame with high gloss finish Frame height front 48.5 cm, rear 50 cm
Handle Bar -- Continuous handlebar
Seatpost -- Angled seat post
Saddle Very large padded coil sprung saddle Widened comfort saddle
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 20″ x 2.0″ cruiser tyres 24 x 1.75”
Rear 20″ x 2.0″ cruiser tyres 20 x 1.75”
Wheel / RIM 20″ wheels --
Brakes
Front V brake Drum
Rear Drum --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 1840 mm 2480 mm
Width 790 mm 750 mm
Weight -- 37 kg
Overview
Features - A twin rear seat to take two young children with safety harness.
- A comfortable riding position, with high handlebars and a very comfortable saddle
- Protective wheel discs to stop little fingers.
- Storage underneath the seat
- Full steel mudguards front and rear
Parking brake lever on handbrake
Rear luggage basket, cable lock
Steering angle limiter, bicycle bell, LED lighting
Closed chain guard, flat front step
Differential, switchable metering option at the front
Additional Details Sealed bearings on rear axle and wheels
Inside leg measurement : 73cm to 84cm
Adjustable for an inseam of 72 – 102 cm at the front
Adjustable for an inseam of 75 – 104 cm at the rear
Low step-in height of 39 cm at the front, 42 cm at the rear

OPTIONS
- Electric support
- 7 Gear hub with freewheel
- 7 Gear hub with coaster brake
- Balance pedal with removable instep strap
- Balance pedal with toe clip
- Foot support with balance weight
- Foot support with lower leg support
- Foot support with balance weight, Velcro
- Crank eccentric, shortener or fixed
- (Double) Back support
- KM counter
- Mirror
- Cane holder

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6814