Motoposh Pinoy 125 vs Yamaha MT-125

Compare Specifications of Motoposh Pinoy 125 and Yamaha MT-125

Selected Bikes

Motoposh Pinoy 125
Motoposh Pinoy 125

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha MT-125
Yamaha MT-125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine Motoposh Brand, 4 Stroke, 1 Cylinder EURO5, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, OHC, 1-cylinder
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Single Type --
Fuel System Carburetor System Electronic fuel injection
Ignition -- Transistor
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 15 PS @ 10,000 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 11.5 NM @ 8,000 rpm
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission -- Sequential gearbox, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Display -- Digital
Frame -- Tubular bridge frame
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 2.75/17 100/80-17M/C 52S (tubeless)
Rear 300/17 140/70-17M/C 66S (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front -- Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 292 mm
Rear -- Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 220 mm
Suspension
Front -- Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø 41 mm 130mm
Rear -- Swing arm, suspension strut linked via a lever system 110mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Cyanstorm
Icon Blue
TechBlack


Physical Specs
Length -- 1960 mm
Width -- 800 mm
Height -- 1065 mm
Weight 100 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 142
Seat Height -- 810
Wheelbase -- 1325 mm
Ground Clearance -- 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10 Ltrs litres 11 litres
Overview
About The Motoposh Pinoy 125 is a bike with a 125 cc engine. It's easy to handle with its basic clutc Read More --
Features -- - EU5 compliant 125cc variable valve timing engine
- Modern, aggressive fairing design
- Dual eye position lights; LED headlight
- anti-hopping clutch
- Sporty Deltabox frame and aluminum swingarm
- High-precision upside-down telescopic fork with 41 mm thick fork tubes
- Sophisticated LCD instruments
- Powerful, radially mounted front caliper
- Large 292 mm disc brakes at the front
- Wide rear tire with 140 section
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 2.1L/100km
CO2 emission: 47g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8412