Precision Cycle Works Nightmare vs Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro

Compare Specifications of Precision Cycle Works Nightmare and Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro

Selected Bikes

Precision Cycle Works Nightmare
Precision Cycle Works Nightmare

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro
Triumph Tiger 900 Rally Pro

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Motor S&S 96 cubic inch motor --
Engine Displacement -- 888.00 cc
Engine -- Liquid-cooled, 12 valve, DOHC, in-line 3-cylinder
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate
Fuel System -- Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid Cooling
Maximum Power -- 93.9 bhp @ 8750 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 87 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Transmission LSD 6 speed transmission 6 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame -- Tubular steel frame, bolt on sub frame
Tyres
Front 90/90-21” front tire 90/90-21
Rear 250 rear tire 150/70R17
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoked Tubeless
Brakes
Front -- Twin 320 mm floating discs, Brembo Stylema 4 piston Monobloc calipers. Radial front master cylinder, Optimised Cornering ABS
Rear -- Brembo single piston sliding caliper.
Suspension
Front -- Showa 45 mm upside down forks, manual preload, rebound damping and compression damping adjustment, 240mm travel
Rear -- Showa rear suspension unit, manual preload and rebound damping adjustment, 230 mm wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors -- MATT KHAKI GREEN
SAPPHIRE BLACK
PURE WHITE


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Height -- 1452-1502 mm
Weight -- 201 kg
Handlebar Width -- 935
Seat Height -- 850-870
Wheelbase -- 1551 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 20 litres
Overview
Features - Single downtube softail frame 40 deg rake 8” Backbone Stretch and 0” Downtube Stretch
- 3” Stretch—center of transmission to center of rear axle. 103” overall length
- Drop seat frame, 18” seat height at frame
- Tube Forks 2” under-7 deg trees
- Speedometer w/trip meter (Digital)
- Custom exhaust pipes
- Steel front and rear fenders
- Carbon fiber composite gas tank
- Wire wheels
- One color paint
- DOT compliant
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5180