Qianjiang QJ3000DT-3 vs Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Compare Specifications of Qianjiang QJ3000DT-3 and Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Selected Bikes

Qianjiang QJ3000DT-3
Qianjiang QJ3000DT-3

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 125 2022
Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Bosch hub motor (3kW) --
Range 80km --
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 125.00 cc
Engine -- 4-stroke;Liquid-cooled;SOHC;Single cylinder;4-valves;EURO5
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Maximum Power -- 12 PS @ @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.2 Nm @ 6000 RPM
Climbing Degree 13° --
Transmission -- V-Belt Automatic
Top Speed 80 kmph --
Battery Removable Swapping Battery system , 2 Removable Lithium batteries(48V26Ah) --
Display Full LCD Meter LCD Display
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front -- 90/80-14M/C 43P Tubeless
Rear -- 130/70-13M/C 63P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 220 mm Disc Brake Two Hydraulic disc brakes
Rear 200 mm Disc Brake Hydraulic single disc brake
Suspension
Front -- Front suspension system : Telescopic forks
Front travel : 90 mm
Rear -- Rear suspension system Unit Swing
Rear travel : 90 mm
Colors Available
Colors Red
Black
White
Blue
Sand Grey
Petrol Blue
Matt Grey


Physical Specs
Length -- 1995 mm
Width -- 750 mm
Height -- 1215 mm
Weight -- 168 kg
Seat Height -- 785
Wheelbase -- 1410 mm
Ground Clearance -- 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 7.2 litres
Overview
Features - Roomy under-seat compartment for a full-face helmet
- Front pocket
- Luggage hook Retractable passenger steps
- USB charger
- Smart Keyless System
- New EURO5 Blue Core 125cc engine
- Optimised three-wheel layout
- New chassis for increased comfort
- Start & Stop engine technology
- Newly developed twin shock rear suspension
- Front and rear disc brakes with optimised UBS
- New LCD instruments with smartphone connectivity
- New Smart Key keyless operation
- Larger footboard area
- LED headlight with broader beam
- Underseat storage and front pocket
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 2.3 L/100 km
CO2 emission : 54 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1087