QJ Motor QJ125(200)-2H vs Yamaha 2022 TW200

Compare Specifications of QJ Motor QJ125(200)-2H and Yamaha 2022 TW200

Selected Bikes

QJ Motor QJ125(200)-2H
QJ Motor QJ125(200)-2H

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 TW200
Yamaha 2022 TW200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 197.00 cc 196.00 cc
Engine 4-Stroke,Single Cylinder,OHV 2V Air-cooled SOHC 4-stroke; 2 valves
Engine Starting Kick/Electric Electric Start
Engine Lubrication Forced and Splash --
Clutch Manual, Multiplate Wet Clutch --
Fuel System Carburetor Mikuni 28mm
Ignition CDI CDI
Cooling System Oil-Cooled --
Maximum Power 13 HP @ 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 13.9 NM @ 6000 RPM --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission Chain Constant-mesh 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern N-1-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Display -- Speedometer
Odometer
Trip meter
Indicator lights
Frame Type : Cradle / Steel --
Tyres
Front 90/90- 17 Tubeless 130/80-18
Rear 130/90- 15 Tubeless 180/80-14
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disk 280 mm Single disc, 220mm
Rear Hydraulic Disk 240 mm Drum, 110mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic 120 mm Telescopic fork; 6.3-in travel
Rear Unit Swing 53 mm Single shock; 5.9-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Grey and Black


Physical Specs
Length 2120 mm 2090 mm
Width 800 mm 820 mm
Height 1060 mm 1120 mm
Kerb Weight 156 --
Seat Height 700 789
Wheelbase 1420 mm 1325 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 264 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.8 litres 7 litres
Overview
Features - Lightweight and Compact Design make the daily city riding more comfortable and enjoyable
- Low Seat Height and 2-Step Seat provide better and comfortable riding experience
- Efficient Disc Braking System: Front - 280mm / Rear - 240mm
Low Seat Height
Torquey Powerplant
Smooth, Counterbalanced Engine
Digital Ignition
Low Maintenance Engine
Lightweight Swingarm
Comfortable Saddle
Protective Fenders
Passenger-Ready
Bright Illumination
Dual Sport Lighting
Fork Protection
Modern Battery
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 25.8°
Trail: 3.4 in
Fuel Economy: 78 mpg
Wet Weight: 278 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

39