Razor C25 vs Turboant X7 Pro

Compare Specifications of Razor C25 and Turboant X7 Pro

Selected Bikes

Razor C25
Razor C25

Brand:

Model:

Turboant X7 Pro
Turboant X7 Pro

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 250-watt, kick-to-start, variable-speed, brushless, rear-wheel hub drive 36 V, 350 W
Range Up to 18 miles (29 km) on a single charge 20-30 miles (30-48 km)
Maximum Power 250W --
Load Carrying Capacity -- 44-275 lb (20-135 kg)
Climbing Degree -- 15°
Top Speed 29 kmph 32 kmph
Speed Low Mode – Up to 10 mph (16 km/h), Sport Mode – Up to 18 mph (29 km/h) --
Battery 36V lithium-ion pack, rechargeable (UL2271) Detachable 10 Ah battery
Charger -- Adapter Input Voltage: 100-240 V, 50/60 Hz
Display LED display --
Frame Steel --
Fork Steel --
Grip Soft, rubber --
Stand Retractable, steel --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp -- 3W
Tyres
Front 12.5″ (318 mm), pneumatic 10-inch, tubed pneumatic tires
Rear -- 10-inch, tubed pneumatic tires
Brakes
Front Hand-operated, electric Disc brake and Foot Brake
Rear Fender brake --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 1083 mm
Width -- 420 mm
Height -- 1186 mm
Weight 14.75 kg 15 kg
Ground Clearance -- 115 mm
Overview
Features - Smoother Ride
- Long Range at High Speeds
- Foldable and Portable
- Rear-Wheel Drive for Stability
- Perfect for Commuters
- Sturdy and Durable
--
Additional Details Throttle: Thumb-activated
Run Time: Up to 60 minutes of continuous use
T-tube: Folding with QR latch design, steel
Deck: Length 23″ (580 mm), Width 5″ (150 mm), steel with full length anti-slip rubber grip tape
Max Rider Weight: 220 lbs (100 kg)
Assembled Product Dimensions: 45″ (114.3 cm) x 17.4″ (44.2 cm) x 44.2″ (112.3 cm)
Age: 18+
Folded Size: 42.6 × 16.5 × 18.1 in (1083 × 420 × 460 mm)
Warning Function: Bell
IP Rating: IPX4
Operating Temperature: 32 to 95 °F (0 to 35 °C)
Storage Temperature: 14 to 104 °F (-10 to 40 °C)
Accessories Reflectors
Battery charger
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5253