Royal Enfield Rumbler 350 vs Yamaha 2022 MT-03

Compare Specifications of Royal Enfield Rumbler 350 and Yamaha 2022 MT-03

Selected Bikes

Royal Enfield Rumbler 350
Royal Enfield Rumbler 350

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 MT-03
Yamaha 2022 MT-03

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 346.00 cc 321.00 cc
Engine Single Cylinder, 4 stroke, Twinspark Liquid-cooled DOHC 4-stroke; 4 valves
Engine Starting Electric and Kick start --
Engine Lubrication Wet sump --
Clutch Wet, multi-plate --
Fuel System Constant Vacuum Carburettor Fuel injection
Ignition Transistorised Coil Ignition --
Maximum Power 19.8 bhp @ 5250 rpm --
Maximum Torque 28 Nm @ 4000 rpm --
Transmission 5 Speed Constant Mesh Constant mesh 6-speed; wet multiplate clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Battery 12 volt, 14 Ah --
Display -- LCD
Frame Single downtube, using engine as stressed member --
Headlamp 55 W / 55 W, HALOGEN LED ring LED
Taillamp LED with position light guides LED
Tyres
Front 19 inch 110/70R17
Rear 18 inch 140/70R17
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front 280 mm Disc, 2-Piston caliper Hydraulic single disc brake, 298mm; ABS
Rear 240 mm Disc, Single Piston Caliper Hydraulic single disc brake, 220mm; ABS
Suspension
Front Telescopic, 41 mm forks, 130 mm travel 37mm KYB inverted fork; 5.1-in travel
Rear Twin gas charged shock absorbers with 5-step adjustable preload, 80mm travel Single shock; 7-step preload adjustable, 4.9-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Stone, Lightning, Marine Cyan Storm
Team Yamaha Blue
Matte Stealth Black


Physical Specs
Length 2060 mm 2090 mm
Width 790 mm 754 mm
Height 1205 mm 1069 mm
Weight 192 kg --
Seat Height -- 779
Wheelbase 1350 mm 1379 mm
Ground Clearance 140 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 20 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features - Removable pillion seat
- Projector headlamp with LED Light GuideHalo Ring
- Set-in cruiser stance and well-padded bucket seat
--
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 25°
Trail: 3.7 in
Fuel Economy: 56 mpg
Wet Weight: 373 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6789