Sharmax GL 770 Ultra vs Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Compare Specifications of Sharmax GL 770 Ultra and Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Selected Bikes

Sharmax GL 770 Ultra
Sharmax GL 770 Ultra

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition
Yamaha 2022 YZF-R7 World GP 60th Anniversary Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 698.00 cc 689.00 cc
Engine 4 Stroke 2 Cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC inline twin-cylinder; 4-valves per cylinder
Engine Starting Electric starter --
Clutch Wet Multiplate --
Fuel System Injector (EFI) Fuel injection
Ignition CDI --
Cooling System Liquid Cooling --
Maximum Power 73.5 Ps @ 8000 --
Maximum Torque 67 Nm @ 6000 --
Transmission 6-speeds, chain 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch; with Assist & Slipper clutch
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Top Speed 205 kmph --
Frame Tubular steel frame --
Tyres
Front 110/80-19 120/70ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22F
Rear 150/70-17 180/55ZR17 Bridgestone® BATTLAX HYPERSPORT S22R
Brakes
Front Double Disc Brake 298mm dual disc hydraulic with ABS
Rear Disc Brake 245mm disc hydraulic with ABS
Suspension
Front Upside-down telescopic fork Telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel, adjustable for preload, rebound and compression
Rear Aluminum profile swingarm Linked-type Monocross shock, adjustable preload and rebound; 5.1-in travel
Colors Available
Colors -- Heritage White/Redline


Physical Specs
Length 5588 mm 2070 mm
Width 2351.5 mm 706 mm
Height 148 mm 1160 mm
Weight 240 kg --
Seat Height -- 835
Wheelbase 1505 mm 1394 mm
Ground Clearance -- 134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19.5 litres 13 litres
Overview
About The Sharmax GL 770 Ultra is a motorcycle that doesn't shy away from showcasing its capabilities Read More --
Features -- Digital LCD Instrumentation
Linear Torque with Smooth Acceleration
Quick Shift System for Smooth Upshifts
Strong, Lightweight Pistons
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 23.7°
Trail: 3.5 in
Fuel Economy: 58 MPG
Wet Weight: 414 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9063