Sherco 250 SE Factory vs TM Racing EN 250 Fi ES 2T

Compare Specifications of Sherco 250 SE Factory and TM Racing EN 250 Fi ES 2T

Selected Bikes

Sherco 250 SE Factory
Sherco 250 SE Factory

Brand:

Model:

TM Racing EN 250 Fi ES 2T
TM Racing EN 250 Fi ES 2T

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.32 cc 249.30 cc
Engine 2 Stroke “Single cylinder with electronically controlled exhaust valve --
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Clutch Hydraulic, multidisc in oil bath Multidisc
Fuel System Keihin PWK 36 --
Ignition DC - CDI ignition with digital advance --
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Transmission 6 speed 6 gears
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Battery Shido LTZ5S Lithium --
Frame High strength Chrome-Molybdenum steel semi-perimeter --
Tyres
Front 1.60 x 21" Blue anodized Excel rim with Michelin Enduro Competition --
Rear 2.15 x 18" Blue anodized Excel rim with Michelin Enduro Competition --
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front 260 mm Brembo Hydraulic 270mm Disc brake
Brake Caliper: Brembo
Rear 220 mm Brembo Hydraulic 245mm Disc brake
Brake Caliper: Nissin
Suspension
Front KYB Fork Double closed cartridge with hydraulic setting and fork springs specific to each model Kayaba 48 mm
Rear KYB Shock Absorber With hydraulic setting and spring setting specific to each model 3-way adjustment TM Racing
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 105 kg
Seat Height -- 985
Wheelbase 1480 mm --
Ground Clearance 355 mm 365 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10.4 litres 8.5 litres
Overview
Features - Exhaust valve system combined with unique auxiliary exhaust valves and a new system powered by an electric motor (reliable, powerful, no wiring, no fouling)
- Lighter NEKEN triple clamps with special engraving
- Full FMF
- Two-tone Domino grips
- Lighter AXP skid plate with new mounting system
- Blue Excel Rims
- Galfer front brake disc
- Dual-material sprocket
--
Additional Details -- ECU: eMoticom
Throttle Body: TM Racing
Steering Head : 63rd
Rear Travel: 300mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

561