Suzuki 2024 GSX-R600 vs Yamaha 2022 XSR700

Compare Specifications of Suzuki 2024 GSX-R600 and Yamaha 2022 XSR700

Selected Bikes

Suzuki 2024 GSX-R600
Suzuki 2024 GSX-R600

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 XSR700
Yamaha 2022 XSR700

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 599.00 cc 689.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, 4-cylinder, DOHC Liquid-cooled DOHC inline twin cylinder; 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric --
Engine Lubrication Wet sump --
Clutch Wet, multi-plate type --
Fuel System Fuel injection with SDTV Fuel injection
Ignition Electronic ignition TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Transmission -- Constant mesh 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Drivetrain Chain, RK525SMOZ8, 114 links Final Drive: Chain
Headlamp 12V 65W (H9 high-beam) and 12V 55W (H7 low-beam) LED
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 120/70ZR17M/C (58W), tubeless 120/70ZR17 Michelin Road 5
Rear 180/55ZR17M/C (73W), tubeless 180/55ZR17 Michelin Road 5
Brakes
Front Brembo, 4-piston, twin disc Dual hydraulic disc, 282mm; ABS
Rear Nissin, 1-piston, single disc Hydraulic disc, 245mm; ABS
Suspension
Front Inverted telescopic, coil spring, oil damped 41mm telescopic fork; 5.1-in travel
Rear Link type, single shock, coil spring, oil damped Single shock, adjustable preload; 5.1-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Pearl Brilliant White/ Metallic Matte Stellar Blue
Metallic Matte Black No. 2 / Glass Sparkle Black
Pearl Brilliant White/ Metallic Triton Blue
Raven


Physical Specs
Length 2030 mm 2075 mm
Width 1135 mm 820 mm
Height -- 1130 mm
Kerb Weight 187 --
Seat Height 810 835
Wheelbase 1385 mm 1404 mm
Ground Clearance 130 mm 139 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 14 litres
Overview
About The Suzuki 2024 GSX-R600 offers an engaging experience for riders, boasting a 599.00 cc 4-strok Read More --
Features - Suzuki Drive Mode Selector (S-DMS)
- Engine Control Module (ECM)
--
Additional Details -- Rake (Caster Angle): 25.0°
Trail: 3.5 in
Fuel Economy: 58 mpg
Wet Weight: 410 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9763