Suzuki UK110 vs Yamaha MT-125

Compare Specifications of Suzuki UK110 and Yamaha MT-125

Selected Bikes

Suzuki UK110
Suzuki UK110

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha MT-125
Yamaha MT-125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 113.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, air cooled, SOHC EURO5, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled, OHC, 1-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric and Kick Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System Fuel Injection Electronic fuel injection
Ignition -- Transistor
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 15 PS @ 10,000 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 11.5 NM @ 8,000 rpm
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission Automatic Sequential gearbox, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain
Display -- Digital
Frame -- Tubular bridge frame
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 80/90-14 M/C 40P 100/80-17M/C 52S (tubeless)
Rear 90/90-14 M/C 46P 140/70-17M/C 66S (tubeless)
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 292 mm
Rear Drum Hydraulic disc brake, Ø 220 mm
Suspension
Front Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø 41 mm 130mm
Rear Swingarm type, coil spring, oil damped Swing arm, suspension strut linked via a lever system 110mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Cyanstorm
Icon Blue
TechBlack


Physical Specs
Length 1845 mm 1960 mm
Width 665 mm 800 mm
Height 1095 mm 1065 mm
Kerb Weight -- 142
Seat Height 755 810
Wheelbase 1260 mm 1325 mm
Ground Clearance 120 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 5.2 litres 11 litres
Overview
About The Suzuki UK110 packs a 113.00 cc engine that's a 4-stroke, air-cooled, SOHC powerhouse. Its f Read More --
Features - Double Helmet Hook
- Comfortable Riding Position
- Rear Carrier
- Camshaft
- Piston
- EU5 compliant 125cc variable valve timing engine
- Modern, aggressive fairing design
- Dual eye position lights; LED headlight
- anti-hopping clutch
- Sporty Deltabox frame and aluminum swingarm
- High-precision upside-down telescopic fork with 41 mm thick fork tubes
- Sophisticated LCD instruments
- Powerful, radially mounted front caliper
- Large 292 mm disc brakes at the front
- Wide rear tire with 140 section
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption: 2.1L/100km
CO2 emission: 47g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3503