SYM E4 NH T 125 vs UM Renagade Vegas 125

Compare Specifications of SYM E4 NH T 125 and UM Renagade Vegas 125

Selected Bikes

SYM E4 NH T 125
SYM E4 NH T 125

Brand:

Model:

UM Renagade Vegas 125
UM Renagade Vegas 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.10 cc 124.20 cc
Engine 4-stroke engine, single cylinder 4-stroke, single cylinder
Engine Starting Electrical starter Electric starting system
Fuel System EFI Electronic fuel injection
Cooling System AIR Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 10 HP @ 8500 RPM 13.6 HP
Maximum Torque 9.5 NM @ 6500 RPM --
Transmission Gear/ 5 speed 6 speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain drive system
Top Speed 99 kmph --
Display -- Digital
Headlamp LED LED and Halogen headlights
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100 / 90-19 100 / 90-18
Rear 130 / 80-17 140 / 90-15
Wheel / RIM Rim Material :
Front - Aluminum
Rear - Aluminum
7 spoke cast wheels
Brakes
Front Disk 288 + CBS 280mm front disc brake
Rear Disk 222 + CBS 240mm rear disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescope fork Hydraulic front telescopic forks
Rear Single swing Double rear shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors Black and White
Red
CAMO
--


Physical Specs
Length 2068 mm 2260 mm
Width 860 mm 840 mm
Height 1195 mm 1120 mm
Weight -- 172 kg
Kerb Weight 150 --
Seat Height -- 770
Wheelbase 1405 mm 1530 mm
Ground Clearance -- 147 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 21 litres
Overview
Features Perimeter frame
2A USB charger
LCD meter
Speedometer
Wire-spoke wheels help on absorbing shock from the road
- Sports cruiser styling
- Contemporary LED & halogen headlight
- Balanced, low centre of gravity
- Low and comfy ribbed seat
- 7 spoke cast wheels
- Handlebar mounted analogue speedo with digital display
- Tall protective windshield
-Disguised pillion seat blends into the design
- Sharp pinstripe decals and rim stickers
- Stealthy black exhaust
Additional Details Emissions Standard - E4
Turning Signal Light :
Front - LED
Rear - LED
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3532