SYM XS 125-K vs Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Compare Specifications of SYM XS 125-K and Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Selected Bikes

SYM XS 125-K
SYM XS 125-K

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition
Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.00 cc 124.70 cc
Engine 1-cylinder liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Fuel System -- Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI (digital)
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 10.88 PS 15.0 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque 9Nm 11.5 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission 5-speed Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame -- Steel Deltabox
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- 100/80-17 M/C
Rear -- 130/70-17 M/C
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front DISC Hydraulic single disc, Ø292 mm
Rear DRUM Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm
Suspension
Front OEM – Non-adjustable Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø41 mm
Rear OEM – Adjustable (pre-load only) Swingarm, (Link type suspension)
Colors Available
Colors -- Monster Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 1990 mm
Width -- 755 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Weight 130 kg 142 kg
Seat Height 790 825
Wheelbase -- 1325 mm
Ground Clearance 150 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 11.5 litres
Overview
About The SYM XS 125-K is an efficient delivery bike, suitable for urban and commercial use. It featu Read More --
Features -- - R-Series body with Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP livery
- YZR-M1 MotoGP-inspired supersport cockpit
- 125cc engine with Variable Valve Actuation
- Aluminium swing arm for high speed stability
- Light and precise Assist & Slipper clutch
- Sophisticated high-visibility LCD instruments
- Powerful braking system
- Wide rear tyre for sharp road holding and style
Additional Details -- Final transmission : Chain
Fuel consumption : 2.13l/100km
CO2 emission : 49g/km
Caster angle : 25º
Trail : 89mm
Front travel : 130 mm
Rear travel : 114 mm
Oil tank capacity : 1.15litres

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3048