TM Racing SMR 125 Fi 2T vs UM Renegade Commando Classic 125

Compare Specifications of TM Racing SMR 125 Fi 2T and UM Renegade Commando Classic 125

Selected Bikes

TM Racing SMR 125 Fi 2T
TM Racing SMR 125 Fi 2T

Brand:

Model:

UM Renegade Commando Classic 125
UM Renegade Commando Classic 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.80 cc 125.00 cc
Engine -- 4-stroke, single cylinder
Engine Starting Kick Electric
Clutch Multidisc --
Fuel System -- Electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid cooled
Maximum Power -- 11.67 hp @ 9000 rpm
Transmission 6 gears 5 speed gearbox
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain -- Chain drive system
Display -- Digital
Frame In self-hardening deltabox type aluminum single beam with extruded, forged and precision cast details --
Chain Queen GPX --
Tyres
Front -- 100 / 90-18
Rear -- 140 / 90-15
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 305mm
Caliper: Brembo (M34)
280mm front disc brake
Rear 245mm
Caliper: Nissin
240mm rear disc brake
Suspension
Front Kayaba 48 mm Hydraulic front telescopic forks
Rear TM Racing Double rear shock absorbers
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- 2270 mm
Width -- 840 mm
Height -- 1125 mm
Weight 100 kg 172 kg
Seat Height 920 770
Wheelbase -- 1530 mm
Ground Clearance 300 mm 147 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 21 litres
Overview
About -- The UM Renegade Commando Classic 125 is a motorcycle that features classic cruiser styling and Read More
Features -- - Classic cruiser styling
- Traditional round chrome style headlight
- Forward footrests and controls
- Low slung cruiser seat
- Wire spoked wheels
- Tank mounted analogue speedo with digital display
- Tall protective windshield
- Sculpted tank with screw on cap
- Stylish and comfy pillion backrest
- Stainless steel exhaust
Um Renegade Commando Classic 125
The classic logo

Um Renegade Commando Classic 125
Disc brake

Um Renegade Commando Classic 125
Engine
Additional Details ECU: eMoticom
Throttle Body: TM Racing
Steering Head : 63rd
Rear Travel: 300mm
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9370